Nepal has been played my all political and non-political morons for a long time. A-male, Congress, Khaobadi and banduke maobadi haru le desh lai dubaounu dubayo. Aba eutai upaya desh bachoune ho. Raja aau ani desh bachou.

yesh ma hami sabai lagoun, sathi ho....kaso?

thanks Danger,

rozen, put urself in king's position and imagine what would have you done if you have to deal with politicians like Girija and Madhav Kumar Nepal. Do you think they care for the country? They can sell Nepal or just easily hand it over to army generals soon. Coz they have this dangerous hunger for power, money and recognition. Maoist are just pretending for a while. But situation is even out of their control. So, King should be there. At least, he should have realized where the things went all wrong.

राजा भनेको हाम्रो देशको गौरव् हो नि, तेस्तो कुरा लाइ पनि हावा मा उदायेर लेख्ने हो? अलिकति लाज शरम छैन? कलियुग् का मान्छे हरु के भाका हुन्?

i dont think king is "GAURAV" of Nepal. king pani gaurav gharna layek ko hunu paryo ni .
i cant take king as identity of nepal. if i take king as identity or idol i should start transferring "Murti" to foreign muesuemes or might be chasing Nameeta sunita once again . pheri future type means PARas type hune ho bhanye i should started going to galaxy with gun and kill innocent civilians like pravin gurung or others victims. one thing i dont understand what king of system u want from nepal ko king gyanendra further headed by paras after that hridanendra. do u want to be like them . atleast semocracy can brinng new faces of leaders but in monarchy no chances. do u want to be "RPRAJA " or u want to be "NARARIK" decide ursself
democracy rocks

I am a BIG ROYALIST.

There are three categories of people in Nepal:

1> Royalist: Educated, learned, wise, and who can foresee the future. The most talented and loyal. They want to work, and dedicated to make the nation prosperous. They are religious, but not extremist.

2> Democratic: People who are corrupted and scared of unemployment if King's direct rule is imposed. Will even sell their daughter, sister and mother, if they are paid--even a cup of coffee. Highly uneducated, so they chose politics as their career; they wont find jobs.

3> Maoists: Uneducated, illiterate, sheep minded, poor, hungry, and also the terrorists. Forcibly want to create communal riots, entertain in civil war, and DO NOT like to work; they rather want to rob, kill, steal, murder, rape so that they can eat.

I am proud I belong to the FIRST category and I AM A ROYALIST.

Jai Desh! Jai Naresh!

Long live king!!!

May be our king has committed some minor misjudgements in the past but I strongly agree that he not committed any offence as that is as bad as the so called Congress, UML, bharaa bhuree parties and the Maoists.

I belong to the first type, I am also proud of it.

sounds like" real me 1's" mouth is surgically attached to royal ass.

we should save our monarchy and tne nation



i am a 100% royalist

i agree with BHATMAS..
BICHARA GYANE LE KE DES BACHAYOS ...
BICHARA AAFAI DESH CHODNA LAGEKO CHHA.....
BICHARA....

TO Royalist
can't u people see Nepali ko chora rulling for his own country...
u people don't have DUM but ..let other nepali do yaar ..
Kati Gyane ko cahmcha bhayera baschau....

Prachande should leave Nepal...You stupid maoists should leave Nepal....you guys don't love Nepal...you love the power and money...Nepal does not need you...

जुन जोगी आए पनि कान नै चिरेको । जब सम्म यी भात मरा नेता हरु मा राष्ट्रियता को भावना हुँदैन तबा सम्म यो देश को केही हुने वाला छैन ।


Jay nepal

प्रजातन्त्र ले बिकृति जन्माएको हो, यसमा कुनै शंका छैन । तर यस्को अर्थ यो होइन कि प्रजातन्त्र नालयक छ। लोकतन्त्र भएर नै खुमे ले कति खाए, गोबिन्दे ले कति हसुरे, कस्ले कुन काण्ड् गरे भन्ने थाह पायौं। आज राजतन्त्र को वकालत् गर्ने हरु हो, के पन्चायत काल् को काल् रात्री भोगेका छौ र आज फेरि राजा आउ देश् बचाउ भन्ने नारा लगाउछौ? ज्ञानेका पुस्ता र पुर्खाले देश को लागि के दिए, सोच्ने बेला भएको छ, सन्देश को पुछार् मा पशुपति नाथ् ले कल्याण् गरुन् भन्ने शब्दाबली बाहेक् केहि कल्याण गरेको थाह छ? राष्टृय एकता को प्रतिक् रे। के राजा नभेको देश मा कहिलेइ एकता भएन र? रास्त्र बाद् patriotism को भावना भएको देश हरुमा इजरायल् नम्बर १ मा र भारत दोस्रो छ, के तिनिहरुको देश मा राजा जिउदो छ ?
ऋचा खान र बगिचा खान का सन्तान हरु ले देश उंभो लगाउने के काम गरे । भजन मात्र गाएर हुँदैन । यथार्थ धरातल मा उभिएर हेर्नु पर्दछ । बी पी ले भनेका थिए, देश रहे त राजा रहन्छ, जनता त जस्तो अबस्थाम पनि जहिले नै अफ्नो परिवार् भित्र शक्ति संघर्ष गर्दै एश र आराम् मा जिन्दगि बिताए।
भक्तपुर् को भूपतिन्द्र मल्ल को शालिक कस्ले क्रेन लागएर उखेल्न खोजे? मछिन्द्र नाथ को सक्कल्लि भोटो कस्ले बेलायत लगे?
बुझ्ने को लागि इशारा काफि छ। नमिता सुमिता काण्ड् का नाइके को थिए।
राम् लक्ष्मण, सरोक् कोइराला लाइ कसरि मारे?
यी कुरा हरु ले राजा ले भलो गर्छ भन्नु हुन्छ? त्यसो भए संसार् भरि का २०० जति राष्ट्र हरुमा, जता ततै राजा नै राजा हुनु पर्थ्यो? किन अब राजा भनेका तास का चार् वटा बाद्शाह् र २-४ मुलुक् मा मात्र सीमित् भएका छन्?
बेलायत र जापन, नेडर्ल्यान्ड्स्, बेल्जियम्, लुक्जेम्बर् अरु अरु केहि मुलुकमा जस्तो प्रतिक मात्र भएर बसेको भए राजतन्त्र दिगो हुन्थ्यो। राजा पनि प्रधान् मन्त्री पनि आफै हुन खोजे के हुन्छ, भोलि को नेपाल् ले देखाउने छ। इरान को शाह हाम्रै आँख अगाडि भाग्नु पर्यो, ज्ञानेको त्यो दिन् पनि यहि आंखाले हेर्न पाउने जस्तो छ।

godiscrazy, that was funny but true

rahulbhai, good analysis ....... maile ta namita sumita birsira .... tyo pokhara kanda haina ??? gyane nai involve thiyo ni haina ki dhirendra???

हो, रिठ्ठे जासुस जी, ज्ञाने नै नाइके थिए, भाइ को नाम मा होस् या दाइ को । लोकतन्त्र त्यो बेला भएको भए केही त राहत हुन्थ्यो, नमिता सुनिता का बृद्ध पिता ले, श्री ५ को सरकार का सचिब थिए उनी ।
सर्प को छाला काण्ड्, गलैचा काण्ड कति काण्ड । सबा दबाए । अहिलेका नव पञ्च हरु लोकतान्त्र पछि का काण्ड हरुको हरि नाम जपी रहेका छन ।
प्रजातन्त्र पछि २०४७ साल पछि देश बिकास को गती र ३० बर्ष को पञ्चायती कुशासनको बिकास को कुनै लेखाजोखा गर्नु भएको छ ? १७ देखि ४७ सम्म कति किमी सडक बने र ४७ साल पछि कति ?
हामीले आइ एस्सी पढ्दा सम्म बर्ष को कति डाक्टर इन्जिनियर पढ्न पाउंथे र अहिले कति ?
४७ साल पछि कति अमेरिका मा पढ्न पाए त्यो भन्दा बढी कति ?
बिकास संग संगै बिकृति बढे , त्यो सत्य हो ?
माओवादी को आतंक र बिचार प्रती असहमत म पनि छु त्यस्को अर्थ यो होइन कि माओवादी को बिरोध गर्न राजाबादी हुनै पर्छ । लोकतान्त्र म बिकृति आयो भन्दै मा निरन्कुश तन्त्र नै ठीक हुन्छ भन्ने कुरा लाई तर्क संगत मान्न कदापी सकिन्न । आफ्नो घर मा मुसा बढ्यो भनेर मुसा मार्न तिर लाग्ने कि, घर जलाउने ?
कुरो यही हो, बुझ्ने लाई श्रीखण्ड न बुझ्नेलाइ खुर्पाको बींड ।

नेताहरुको तोरीलाउरे पाराले गर्दा नै राजा फेरी हिरो बन्दै जाने र राजाको चम्चाहरुको स्वर चर्को हुदै जाने क्रम शुरु भएको हो । यो त सबैलाइ थाहा छ तर गर्ने के त अव ?

If someone really feels responsible for Nepal, he is only the king of Nepal. It is not easy for him to migrate other country and live like a migrant. Coz he has a country by birth and he is there to protect and look after the country. Just because situation is not favourable, he should not give up his authority to lead a Nepal. Others, politicians and people, can talk and sell themselves anywhere. But King should rule Nepal without CHAMCHAS like kamal thapa and others. He should appoint young generation to develop ney system in the country.

I agree with you Bhatmas.

I believe the new way to develop Nepal is to execute all the politicians and terrorists. Hand over the power to the new generation.

Raja aundaina desh bachoundaina.
Lets think of an alternative- the new generation of Political Leaders.
Lets join hands to defeat the freaking Terrorists.

Prachanda Murdabad.

ll i am trying to say is instead of revenge game ...be productive and think for nation ..why we need more blood.In process of kicking king out many people will die for nothing.Just to replace with another dictator name:Prachanda.

King won't go so easily ,If the king goes there will be more blood shed and ultimately it will be Maoist.That for sure!!!If you are neutral person .Then forgive and forget and move on ..Make new nepal ..once again the responsibility has come to political parties ..prove to nepal that They are capable ..otherwise they do not diserve to rule Nepal...Let the king be ceremonial , pay tax, nationalize the property and make him figure head.Why so excited bringing communist in Nepal???

I don't want so called king Gyanendra nor rebel leader Prachanda. I need a leader who can lead against all the odds. Nepal is my country, your country, our country.