How many of you think, eradicating Monarchy is a solution for Nepal? If you think so, enlighten your wisdom, which I am sure cannot be achieved; it will come from your self-esteem.

Check the data, who killed more?

People are talking about JanandolanII: not more than 20 people died, what about Terai Andolan, more than 30 people died. Shouldn't the govt of Nepal, including the spammers and the terrorists be blamed for this and a probe committee be formed? Think honestly

What did king do? He just tried to save his country. What WRONG step did he take, that others did not and you are favoring Terrorists and Spammers? if all are killers, he is the least. If all are violators of human rights, king is the least. if all are undemocratic, king is the least. if all are chaotic, king is least.

If all are loyal to Nepal, king is the MOST, it is his nation, and he is the head of the family. he loves and cares he family. Sometimes even a parent makes mistake, but we not change out parents. King stands in the same page.

Secularism means no preference of religion. After declaring Secular, Nepal is divided in religion. What did you get?

Even if you believe king has lot of money, all the king in this world has money. If you think he is corrupt, all the spammers and terrorists are corrupts. Do you think Prachu Bhaiya can afford by the watch he is wearing. Certainly, he cannot. He will rob from us. Atleast king will not, he owns businesses.

If anyone can convince me that king is wrong in any aspects, I am ready to give up my thoughts.

Show me guys!!!

King loyal to his crown more than people .....Girja ...Parchanda, and their followers in the name civil society,Lawyers,journalists , There are loyal to INDIA.....when one Indian junior Ministry officals visit Nepal then it will be a big big headline in Nepali news paper.......and one small leaders of india...Sitaram yechuri...He was the most welcome person and hero in parliaments first sesssion..suppose he is the furtune maker of Nepali people...he merely represent 1 percent of indian people ....because his party is very small...But in Nepal he is most welcome leaders and respected in parliaments.. ....such tradition won't help Nepali people.....

I am not saying the that we need a king ruling us. I don't want a person ruling us for the rest of my life. However, tell me a name of a person who u think is capable of ruling nepal. Someone who is fair, who is not corrupt, who really wants to help nepal from his heart, someone who is educated enough to know what is good and what is not, someone who is brave enough to accept critisism and listen to the people... If you know someone like that, then we'll all vote for him. I don't want the king, but there he says he is not going to rule for ever. He did say he will give the power back to the people once the situation comes under control.

HE FUGGING HAD HIS CHANCE AND HE FUGGING BLEW IT.
AND THIESE IDIOTS WANT TO GIVE HIMA ANOTHER CHANCE SO HE CAN FUG UP ALL OVER AGAIN ? HE HE HE
NO FUGGING WAY.

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-Ytx7Nqyac

राजा सबै भन्दा लोयल नभएर को हुन्छ त?सबै भन्दा मोज नै उसैलाइ छ।तपाइको छ नेपलमा ५०००० रोपनि जमिन?तपाइको छ देशका सबै ठुला उध्योगमा सेयर?तपाइ पाउनु हुन्छ करौडो तलब? सबै ठुलो भाग उस्ले पाउने भए पछि सबै भन्दा लोयल त हुने नै भयो नि।यो कुरामा चाहि विवाद नगरे पनि हुन्छ।राजालाइ जति देशको माया चाहिँ इ भुरे ऐरे गैरे नत्थु खैरे नेताहरुलाइ हुनै सक्दैन।यो चाहि पक्का हो।

Jai Nepal
Some good name will come among us. In days to come. But if you let the king continue he will go and his son will succeed. Gyanendra is not our problem, it is the system. G is just a name, what we don't want is the title KING itself be it Birendra , Mahendra, Gyanendra or Paras name doesn't matter.

Neta bhaneko ta tapai hami honi. Some are good and some are bad. Ramro lai chance dine ta hamro daito ho. Neta atleast tyaha pugna dherai sangharsa gareka hunchan, by birth tilak lagayera aayeka ta hoinan ni. Ani tyo choose garne jimma ta hamro honi koslai pathaune mathi kosle hami lai lead garna sakcha bhanne kura ta we have to make the choice. and I agree sometimes we are left with little choice and sometimes we make bad choices. But you can fool some ppl some time but you can't fool all the people all the time. Let the democracy grow.

I agree with Bodmas. We need democracy.. i am against Autocratic rule of the king. However, do u think the political parties will win the election? No way dude, the Maoists will do anything not to lose the election.... They will altimately win (by whatever means they can) and then nepal will be the first country in the world to be ruled by the Terrorists. And then the US will attack us just like they attacked Saddam.. and thousands of nepali people wil die.. and then the US will never leave Nepal just like thay don't leave Iraq.
See the long story?

When it comes to ruling and wining, maoist now or in future will need the support of people. Pahile jasto hudaina ni aba, Mao ko jasto communist ta aja bholi chaldaina. Look at 47 sal ko andolan we thought communist to be totally different than the congress. Tara MaKuNe ta Girija bich tapai lai kehi farak lagcha? aba ko 5 barsa pachi Prachade ra Shere ma pani kehi antar hudaina. Tapai le rakheko point pani valid cha WE can't rule it out. Tara bottom line is there is no better option to democracy neither king nor the communist. Long Live our faith in democracy. And lets hope Nepali people to be educated enough to make the right decision.

If Nepal has to be ruled by Terrorists and Spammers:

I say:

Fkkuu Nepal! Jai Madhesh!!

bodmas " Prachande is one of us , if we don't like girija or prachande we can kick their ass anytime"
ya good luck kicking them out if you dont like prachands you will be get killed...............
so think before you say or go see the situtaion in nepal....looks like you havent been to nepal for ages........................................... looks like bodmas is looking for his ears..........

bodmas "Neta bhaneko ta tapai hami honi. Some are good and some are bad. Ramro lai chance dine ta hamro daito ho. Neta atleast tyaha pugna dherai sangharsa gareka hunchan, by birth tilak lagayera aayeka ta hoinan ni. Ani tyo choose garne jimma ta hamro honi koslai pathaune mathi kosle hami lai lead garna sakcha bhanne kura ta we have to make the choice."
well one of the bigest problem in nepal is people can figure out the diffent between good and bad netas them selves they do what they are told to do.
and you cant make a choice living in different country eating burger and stake..........
people like you just talk big and nothing come out.......................
to tell you the truth you dont give a shit about the country cuz you are already in safe place you just feel sad cuz its you birth place.................other then that all you gonna do is talk........................

bodmas "When it comes to ruling and wining, maoist now or in future will need the support of people. Pahile jasto hudaina ni aba, Mao ko jasto communist ta aja bholi chaldaina."
hahaha hahaha thats funniest thing i ever heard.........................Do you see the fact that where they have come now with the help of the GUN do you see GUN. and have you Seen who uses thoes GORU LIKE PEOPLE.......................they dont give shit about other people and who they are all they care about is money and there upper hand dude wake up.......................................and try to see what is really happening.....................

GuruJi,

Kalle takrayo Takma? Man na mehman mai tera mehman!!!!! bhuknai pareni ali tune milayera bhukauna. Gai jasto BAAAAAA garera pani bhukai hunchha ra!!!

Democratic Hypocrisy in Nepal

By Sachet Samaj

The SPAMers, their student wings and even the human rights activists have thrown tantrums over King Gyanendra's democracy day statement. Labelling the King's statement as ill-intentioned, unconstitutional and inappropriate, the SPAMers and affiliates have organized protest rallies to denounce his statement. The civil society leaders have gone a step ahead by demanding a censure on all the King's actions, statements and even called for an imposition of a travel ban. This hypocritical outcry over the King's statement exhibits the illiberal and despotic demeanour of the self proclaimed democrats and civil society leaders. While SPAMers continue to put on a fictitious display of liberality by propounding democratic fustian, underneath the veneer of emancipatory disposition lies their true self drenched in hypocritical bigotry.

Since the collapse of the royal regime, Nepal has been declared a democratic state. In accordance with the declaration, every Nepali citizen regardless of age, race, religion, sex or status has been bestowed with a right to voice his/her opinion under the rule of law. That is the essence of liberal democracy. It is the notion of equality, liberty and freedom of all human beings that differentiates democracy from all other forms of governance. In congruence, any citizen has an inherent right to exercise those fundamental rights under the rule of law. Unless the King is considered non-living or a foreigner (which he is not), he too is bestowed with the same individual rights as any other Nepali. Maybe not as a head of state, since the constitution has mothballed monarchy for the time being, but as an individual, he possesses every right to voice his tale.

The SPAMers have pointed to the unconstitutionality of the King's speech but they remain at fault. Regardless of which constitution they are referring to, there is no such clause or mention in any constitution that proscribes the King from making statements. Even if the King is regarded as an ordinary citizen, there is no such mention in any post 1990 constitution that forbids any Nepali from expressing an opinion under the rule of law. Also, unless Nepal is taken as a dictatorial nation, it would be quite improbable to have a law that would prevent any accused from an exonerating attempt.

The right to defend oneself from potential harm is irrefutably a universal human right and the King has every right to defend himself from the incriminating charges brought against him. As the SPAMers have charged the King with numerous accounts of human rights violations, like any other individual, the King has a right to explain himself. Even the dictum of "human rights declaration" grants every individual an inviolable right to defend oneself against any penal offence. Again, unless Nepal is an absolute dictatorship like North Korea, the law still allows for an individual to express oneself and defend oneself as long as it does not contradict or violate it. And from the King's statement, there is nothing to indicate that he has broken any law of Nepal.

Two obvious conclusions can be drawn from this ruckus. Either Nepal is not a democratic nation as proclaimed, or the SPAMers and their affiliates have exhibited a blatantly hypocritical stance. While the SPAMers wailed clamouring for free speech during the royal regime, they themselves are clearly unwilling to allow the same. They seem to be hell bent on preferential treatment. From what has become apparent, anything unpalatable to the SPAMers will be abominated as undemocratic, un-constitutional and illegitimate. Such partisan attitude exhibited by the SPAMers only negates any semblance of democratic accreditation.

Even after having eviscerated the King, the SPAMers still pound on him a little more at every opportunity they get. While the atrocities of the Maoists have clearly been justified and even rewarded with eighty three seats in the interim parliament, the Monarchy has been compelled to absorb all the flak. Given such onslaught, the Monarchy has been left with no accommodating alternative. With such narrow options for sustenance, it should come as no surprise if it opted for militancy.

The Maoist insurgency should have taught our leadership unforgettable lessons; it only takes a handful of resolute individuals to destabilize the nation and exclusion is not the answer to enduring peace. And even the recent Madhes uprising stands testament to that fact.

For those who remain oblivious to this assertion, it might be a little too late when another spark engulfs the nation. Hence, if Nepal seeks to avoid any more calamities, the only available alternative for sustainable peace lies in the trinity of People, Parties and Palace. Unless all the elements comprehend and acknowledge a symbiotic relationship, the future of a peaceful Nepal will remain a pipedream.

Copyright © 2007, NewsBlaze, Daily News

Nicely said Shuvachintak. I couldn't agree more.

Well gyane le ke garyoo tyo phaile nai hami le dekhi sakyoooo......Feri government ramro sanga function bhayena bhanera feri parliament freeze garne ani country ma sainik sasan lagaune plan hola ni sale gyane... ko..........

marna nasakeko gyane........ aasti dhunga le gadi ma handa mareko bhaye thik hunthiyoo........Well every dog has it's tail so doess gyane and he will show his tail when he'll be the monarchy of The new NEpal.....

-Rockend

Terrorists don't deserve life. Hell is waiting for them.

Nepalese sheep are not in a state ti understand good or bad. The devastation is led by the Terrorists and Spammers.

Sitaula deserves death.

This king is no better than Saddam. the sooner he is executed,the faster peace will reign in Nepal.

I agree that the King is most loyal. But since Nepal is being ruled by terrorists we have declared our independence from the Pepublic's Republic of Nepal because we do not want to be associated with a terrorist/axis of evil country.

Long live the Great Nation of FOUR FEDERAL REPUBLICS of Rukum, Siraha, Morang and Bhojpur!