This real story starts at 2048 B.S. when Nepali Congress was ruling Nepal with their majority in Nepal parliament and Nepal Rastriya Sabha. Almost 2/3rd seats were won by Nepali Congress party in the election which was held recently.

Mr. Girija Prasad Koirala in his state visit to India signed a treaty with India about couple of rivers of Nepal without the acknowledge of Nepal's other political party, Nepali Press, Nepali Public as well King Birendra. He gave full rights to India to use the water of those river. If some Nepali people in the border would use couple of hundred gallon water to irrigate their fields, it would be criminal act for Indian Government and Nepalese current government silently supported that.

IN ANOTHER WORDS, OUR PRIME MINISTER AND HIS PARTY SOLD OUR RIVERS TO INDIA.

I THINK YOU ALL WONDER HOW COME GOVINDA RAJ JOSHI, KHUM BAHADUR KHADAKA AND OTHER NEPALI CONGRESS LEADERS HAD BILLIONS OF NEPALESE CERRENCY SITTING IN THE BANKS ALL OVER THE WORLD.

OUR PRIME MINISTER GIRIJA'S DAUGHTER "MISS. SUJATA KOIRALA" HAS BELEIVED TO BE AT LEAST 20 ARAB NEPALESE CURRENCY IN VARIOUS INIDAN BANKS INCLUDING SWISS BANK.BELEIVE IT OR NOT!!!!!!!!!!llETS NOT TALK ABOUT PRIME MINISTER HIMSELF!!!!!! I WONT BE SURPRIZED IF HE HAS MORE MONEY THAN LALI PRASAD YADAV.

LET ME UNLOCK THE MYSTERY OF THE SECRETS OF THOSE LEADERS GETTING RICH!!!

oUR DEAR PRIME MINISTER SOLD RIVERS TO INDIA 15 YEARS BACK. THAT RIVER IS SUPPOSED TO GENERATE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IF NOT TRILLION OF DOLLARS WORTH OF ELECTRICITY FOR NEXT 200-300 YEARS AS WELL ANOTHER TRILLIONS OF DOLLAR WORTH OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS CAN BE PRODUCED FOR NEXT 200-300 YEARS BY IRRIGATING THE WATER FROM THAT RIVER.

Because of the corrupt Leader in Nepali Congress, Nepal couldnot benefit from those river. India does not pays a penny as a tax or royalty for using Nepalese rivers. Because they paid large chunk of money to Girija and his friends in Nepali congress to make a deal or in another word to buy these rivers.

THE FIGURE MIGHT LOOK TOO BIG AND UNBELEIVEBALE.BUT THAT IS THE TRUTH GUYS. WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT 10-12 YEARS USE OF THAT RIVER, THE ONE GIRIJA AND OTHER nEPALI CONGRESS LEADERS SOLD TO INDIA......WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE USE OF THAT RIVER FOR ANOTHER 200-300 YEARS.

I WONDER HOE MUCH WOULD INDIA BENEFIT FROM THOSE RIVERS EEVNTHOUGH NEPAL DID NOT GOT A PENNY!!!!!!

balbahadur bhanna khojeko balbhadra bhayacha------typo mistake

I heard that Seiko bro is Sujata's nalayak son....

Seiko bro, i hope you are having fun spending money of ur mom Sujata and ur grand pa Girija's.

Thats why u are after me just because i told about ur mom and ur grand pa's corruption's kartut haru.......

If Nepal had diamond and gold mines....damn...seiko bro and his koirala family would be the most richest person in the world and Nepal would be the most poorest country in the world.

true that

I have come to conclusion that you "CAN NOT RUN A POLITICAL ORGANIZATION WITHOUT CORRUPTION".

View/Share this post only

" You get money if there is no development, if development,there is no money coming. Why bother developemnt, keep it up this way, so we keep getting money"---- Mr. Khum bahadur khadka...

Sale Khume......he takes 90% of fevelopment money in his pocket and use 10 % for development thing..He is one of the @ssss hole of nepal and girija's chela....

khum bahadur ko statement nai tehi ho. teska chora ra chori haru lie ghus khako paisa gumsyaudai thikka cha murdar lie.paklakai mor.

I heard that there is big $$$$ commision game going on between girija, Nepal Oil Corporation and the private party who wants to get the new liscense to sell oil in Nepalese market.

WHOEVER PAYS MORE $$$$$ TO SUJATA AND GIRIJA, THEY WILL GET THE LISCENSE TO SELL OIL IN NEPAL.

We basically proved that it is NOT possible to run a political organization without these kind of hanky-panky and who ever is in power or prospect to come into power are bound to be corrupt.

Hence all these discussions are useless and waste of time.

काग कराउदै गर्छ घुस खांदै गर्छ, पार्टी चलाउदै गर्छ !

Curbing Corruption: The innovative approach

The answer is not to cross our fingers and pray that the leaders will be sincere but rather to blueprint an arrangement that would make bribery and fraudulence unattractive to persons of power

By Nischal M. S. Basnyat

“It is not that Nepal didn’t have the money,” said the young UNDP officer with a sinister sneer “Why do you think your leaders ride fat cars and walk on Persian carpets?” In fact, the only economic Index we seem to be ascending is the Corruption Perceptions Index commissioned annually by Transparency International. Ranked as the 47th most corrupt country on earth by 2005, Nepal enjoys the prestigious position of being more corrupt than historically corruption-ridden nations like Malawi and Libya.

So, whom do we blame for the decades of unprecedented corruption? Of course our initial finger pointing goes towards our leaders, and rightly so. Our philanthropic leaders have set an example for all charity workers worldwide; successfully dividing up the nation’s scarce riches, not only among themselves but to family members and friends alike. Domestic and foreign policy in the country lacked innovation because our judicious heads of state were busy spending all their creative input in managing their abundance of cash. Some hid it in their walls, some spent it on their daughters’ lavish weddings, some used it to buy apartments outside the country and of course some hid it in their water tanks. Although such dim-witted ones might have been exposed, the cunning, I’m sure, still hold large foreign bank accounts, from Indian banks to the impenetrable Swiss.

Who could forget the nepotism? Army generals started promoting cousins and started sending the rest towards Maoist territory, ministers started appointing their relatives as ambassadors and national laws were twisted to favor a family member’s promotion in the government. All-in-all Nepal became a massive network of family run businesses. As the poor lay starving, even those that had worked so hard to get into power soon forgot their national duties.

So, how do we eradicate this crippling social illness? Many say that in the end it lies in the hands of our leaders and that their honesty and dedication decides the fate of the nation. True, yet how long are we willing to wait for the next Mahatma Gandhi or our very own Nelson Mandela? From ministers asking for ten crores to clerks asking for ten rupees, the culture of corruption has become deep-rooted in our society. Although every nation, from the most developed to the least, has their share of corrupt leaders, many of these countries are still prospering. By human nature one will try to exploit their position in power, so the solution comes in acknowledging that the system needs to be redesigned to keep the leaders on the right track. If there is room for corruption it will inevitably take place. Our country is corrupt and corruption flourishes because there are people in power who benefit from the present system. The answer is not to cross our fingers and pray that the leaders will be sincere but rather to blueprint an arrangement that would make bribery and fraudulence unattractive to persons of power.

The following schemes, tried and tested in other nations, are vital to ensure that corruption no longer impedes the crucial developmental work that is needed for the country to move forward:

First, an anonymous anti-corruption unit should be established. Often referred to as the ‘Hong Kong method’, this exceptional solution to corruption was adopted by the island in the early 90s. A secret team of corruption fighters, many of whom actually worked in the government offices and ministries themselves, caught acts of corruption in their own respective ministries with irrefutable evidence. Hence, not knowing who is an anti-corruption agent and who isn’t will play a psychological toll on individuals involved in corruption. Such a method will play head-games with government officials, and even if this small team of secretive informants doesn’t do their job, the idea that anyone in the office could be watching your move will deter officials from bribery and deceit. It’s like saying: if a driver knows where the cops are in the highway, he’ll slow down when he sees them to avoid a speeding ticket, but if the driver doesn’t know, chances are he’ll drive slow throughout the trip.

Secondly, the government should not fund anti-corruption agencies itself. The government and its politicians should have no hand in appointing or running the day-to-day activities of agencies such as the Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA), nor should it have the slightest clout upon such an organisation. The personnel involved in the anti-corruption task force should have no history, affiliation or relations to political parties. The solution can be establishing an independent organization with no association with the government or giving the job to organizations like CW (Corruption Watch) or TI (Transparency International). This approach has been taken by a handful of countries and also by the World Bank in order to monitor its money. When political leaders have the chance to pick the people watching over them or when the anti-corruption officers themselves start playing politics we will end up back at square one.

Third, a watchdog agency should be established to make sure that the main anti-corruption agency like the CIAA itself is doing the right job. This “watchdog for the watchdog” approach exists in various Asian countries where there is an anonymous taskforce established to track the work of the main anti-corruption organization and to make sure that the anti-corruption agency itself is not corrupt, which is often the case in Nepal.

Fourth, the government should increase the salary of ministers and top bureaucrats. This technique was famously adopted by Singapore during the height of its economic instability and corruption in the late 80s. By paying the decision makers a large salary it took away their need to earn under the desk. Foreign aid and national income from industries like tourism and customs were put back into the nation without a large chunk being taken out of it from the powerful elite in the country. In addition, subordinates were found less likely to be corrupt if their bosses were faithful. Although the nation will loose money by increasing the incomes of these top officials, if we do our calculations right, the country can benefit greatly from this pioneering approach.

Fifth, a person in power should know how long he or she is to remain in that position and should be appointed to a definite period of time. Corruption in most countries, especially ours, is often based on lack of job security. When one sacrifices their entire life for politics and finally comes to power for a brief stint of time they will obviously seek to milk the benefits of their struggle. Although such a step requires massive renovation of the political structure in Nepal, term wise selection of politicians and top bureaucrats is a must, not just for tackling corruption but also for long-term development and planning.

Sixth, we must separate politics and bureaucracy. Post 1990, politicians started appointing government officials who would give them a commission once they were appointed to power. Certain ambassadors and consul generals would often give a portion of their corrupt earnings back to the political party that appointed them. Such “dalal politics” where politicians and bureaucrats do favors for one another has to be eliminated. In India where they have the same kind of unfaithful politicians from Bihar to Madhya Pradesh, politics rarely obstructs bureaucratic appointments or promotions. In this way, this emerging superpower of a billion is run efficiently not by politicians but by bureaucrats. Thus, detaching the bond between politics and bureaucracy will slowly alleviate corruption and nepotism from our own system.

Seventh, the deep-seated tie between our industrialists and politicians needs to be severed. From VAT regulations to fiscal strategies, many of our economic policies are geared towards favoring certain business moguls, knowing that there are benefits for the politicians for doing so. Whoever has come to power has ended up favoring his own business or the businesses of those closest to him. Monetary policies have to be reformed to make sure they favor the interests of the “average-Ram” and not favor the family and friends of the powerful.

Finally, the media, which has become the leitmotif of anti-corruption in recent years, has to abandon political agenda. It is unfortunate, but all of us know that some of our biggest media houses have political agenda and are giving the people what they want the people to know instead of what the people deserve to know. Media ownership along with the independence of editors must be under scrutiny to make sure they don’t turn a blind eye to reports of corruption or wrongly accuse political enemies of corruption. In a way, the media, as the supervisory body of society, has the greatest role to play in slaying corruption.

In the end, our Nepali cultural mindset of looking up to those that amass wealth and our tendency to agglomerate property for our sons, grandsons and if possible our seven generations also leads to corruption in higher offices. The four “pillars of integrity”; the justice system, watchdog agencies such as the auditor generals office, the media and law enforcement agencies should all work to uphold the nation’s dedication towards fighting corruption. Along with adopting novel approaches for combating corruption, we must remember that in an already deteriorating system, even if one “pillar of integrity” fails to be vigilant and do justice to the people of Nepal, the entire structure is at danger of collapse.

Although the same people whom we may call “fathers of corruption” are back in power today, they have been granted a second chance. If corruption and mismanagement of government was their greatest crime post 1990, correcting that mistake will be their greatest victory.

Currently studying in La Sorbonne (Paris), Basnyat is a student at Harvard University. A senior editor for the Harvard South Asian Journal, his writing has been featured in an upcoming book with eminent author MBI Munshi. He can be reached at nbasnyat@fas.harvard.edu)

For me atleast, it looks like Girija is going to make our beloved nepal another Sikkim.

Hopefully there will be combody who can stop nepal being sikkim.

 

Copied version from:

http://www.krishnasenonline.org/janadisha/year7/issue175/cover.htm

नेपाली जनतालाई रंगीन सपना बाँडेर २०५३ असोज ४ गते शुक्रबार मध्यराति संसद्बाट अनुमोदन गरियो 'महाकाली नदीको एकीकृत विकास सन्धि' । यो सन्धि गर्न हाल संविधानसभा निर्वाचनमा उम्मेदवारी दिएका संसद्वादी दल र तिनका बडे-बडे नेताहरू नै एकमत भएका थिए । हजारौं जनताले सडकमा उत्रेर विरोध गर्दा गर्दै पनि दर्जनौं जनताको हत्या गरेर र कयौंलाई घाइते बनाएर बलजङ्खत्ती गरिएको थियो त्यो सन्धि । सत्तारुढ दल नेपाली कांग्रेस, राष्ट्रिय प्रजातन्त्र पार्टी, नेपाल सद्भावना पार्टी र प्रमुख प्रतिपक्षी दल नेकपा -एमाले)ले दिल खोलेर सुम्पिएका थिए महाकाली भारतलाई ।

हुन त एमालेले चाहेको भए त्यो सन्धिलाई असफल बनाउन सक्थ्यो तर चाहेन । बरु हरेकपटक त्यसको मुक्तकण्ठले स्वागत र र्समर्थन गर्‍यो । अनि एमालेका महासचिव माधवकुमार नेपाल र केन्दीय नेता केपी शर्मा ओली नै महाकाली सन्धि गरेपछि स्याटेलाइट प्रविधिबाट विदेशीलाई विजुली बेचेर नेपालमा वर्षेनी अर्बौं-खर्बौं वर्षाउन सकिन्छ भन्दै जनतामा झूटा आश्वासनहरू बाँड्नमा तल्लिन भए ।

भारत र अमेरिकाबाट 'ग्रिन सिग्नल' आएपछि एमाले पनि नतमस्तक भएर महाकालीमा राष्ट्रघात गर्न पुग्यो । विज्ञहरूका अनुसार कांग्रेसको एकमना सरकारको पालामा टनकपुर लिइसकेको भारतले एमालेलाई पनि टनकपुरभित्र हाल्न टनकपुरलाई महाकालीकै प्याकेजमा हालेर 'महाकाली प्याकेज' ल्याएको थियो । तर एमाले त्यो प्याकेजरूपी 'पिँजडा' मा सजिलै पस्यो ।

तर यसरी महाकाली भारतलाई सुम्पने सत्तापक्ष र प्रतिपक्षका दल र तिनका नेताहरूले आजसम्म पनि महाकालीमा नेपाल ठगिएकै थियो भन्ने हिम्मत गर्नसकेका छैनन् । न त महाकालीबाट अर्बौं-खर्बौं कमाउन सकिन्छ भन्ने नेपाल र ओलीहरूले जनताका अगाडि गएर माफी नै मागेका छन् । तथापि अहिले फेरि यी र यस्तै लाचार नेताहरू 'हामीहरू नै गणतन्त्र र संविधानसभा निर्वाचनका जननी हौं । त्यसैले राष्ट्रहित र जनहित गर्छर्ाा' भन्दै जनतामा भ्रम छर्दैछन् ।

हस्ताक्षरदेखि अनुमोदनसम्म

तत्कालीन श्री ५ को सरकार, नेपाल र भारतबीच २०४७ सालको नेपालको संविधानको धारा १२६ मा उल्लेखित 'प्राकृतिक स्रोत र त्यसको उपयोगको बाँडफाँडबारे कुनै अर्को देशसँग हुने सन्धिको अनुमोदन संसद्को दुवै सदनका उपस्थित सदस्यहरूमध्ये दुइ तिहाई बहुमतबाट हुनुपर्ने' प्रावधानअनुसार यो सन्धिमा हस्ताक्षर र त्यसको अनुमोदन गरियो ।

सर्वप्रथम तत्कालीन श्री ५ को सरकार र भारत सरकारबीच २०५२ माघ १५ गते परराष्ट्रमन्त्री स्तरमा सन्धिमा प्रारम्भिक हस्ताक्षर भयो । हस्ताक्षर नेपालका तत्कालीन परराष्ट्रमन्त्री डा.प्रकाशचन्द्र लोहनी र भारतका विदेश मामिलासम्बन्धी मन्त्री प्रणव मुखर्जीले गरेका थिए । माघ १५ गते साँझ प्रधानमन्त्रीको कार्यालय सिंहदरबारमा भएको हस्ताक्षर समारोहमा प्रधानमन्त्री शेरबहादुर देउवा, सत्तारुढ दलका मन्त्रीहरू, राप्रपाका तत्कालीन अध्यक्ष सूर्यबहादुर थापा, एमालेका केन्द्रीय नेताहरू केपी शर्मा ओली, भरतमोहन अधिकारी, झलनाथ खनाल र प्रेमसिंह धामी तथा नेपाल मजदुर किसान पार्टीका अध्यक्ष नारायणमान विजुक्छेको उपस्थिति थियो ।

सन्धिमा हस्ताक्षरअघि २०५२ माघ १२ गते तत्कालीन सभामुख रामचन्द्र पौडेलको संयोजनमा संसद् भवन सिंहदरबारमा कांग्रेस, एमाले र राप्रपाको बैठक बसी सन्धि पारित गर्ने सहमति भएको थियो । कांग्रेस-एमालेका शीर्षस्थ नेताहरूले त्यही आधारमा एक लिखित दस्तावेजमा हस्ताक्षर गरेका थिए । यो बैठकमा माधवकुमार, झलनाथ, अमृतकुमार बोहोरा, प्रेमसिंह धामी उपस्थित थिए ।

सन्धिमा परराष्ट्रमन्त्री स्तरमा हस्ताक्षर भएकै दिन एमाले केन्द्रीय कमिटीको २५ औं बैठक बसी एक विशेष प्रस्ताव पारित गर्दै सन्धि सम्पन्न भएकोमा स्वागत र र्समर्थन गरिएको थियो ।

उक्त बैठकद्वारा पारित प्रस्तावमा भनिएको छ-'नेकपा -एमाले)को सरकार भएको बेलामा भारत सरकारसँग गरेको वार्ताको क्रममा समस्या समाधानको ठोस आधारहरू तयार पारेको र अहिले तिनै कुराका आधारमा औपचारिक सन्धि सम्पन्न भएकोले यो बैठक यस सन्धिलाई र्समर्थन गर्दछ ।'

यस्तै २०५२ माघ १७ गते एमालेका तत्कालीन अध्यक्ष एवं पूर्व प्रधानमन्त्री मनमोहन अधिकारीले पनि एक वक्तव्य जारी गरी सन्धिको खुला र्समर्थन गरेका थिए ।

परराष्ट्रमन्त्रीस्तरको सन्धिपछि प्रधानमन्त्री देउवा २०५२ माघ २९ गते भारत भ्रमण गए । देउवा तथा भारतीय प्रधानमन्त्री पी.भी.नरसिंह रावले माघ २९ गतेकै राति भारतको नयाँदिल्लीस्थित हैदरावाद हाउसमा सन्धिका अंग्रेजी, हिन्दी र नेपाली भाषाका प्रामाणिक प्रतिमा हस्ताक्षर गरे ।

राजा वीरेन्द्रले २०५३ असार १२ गते बुधबारदेखि सुरु हुने गरी संसद्को दसौं अधिवेशन बोलाए । असोज २६ गतेसम्म ७४ दिन चलेको त्यो अधिवेशनको बीचमा असोज ४ गते शुक्रबार राति उक्त सन्धि अनुमोदन गरियो ।

अनुमोदनअघि एमालेबीच सन्धिको पक्ष र विपक्षमा विवाद जन्मियो । त्यसपछि एमाले केन्द्रीय कमिटीमै खुला र गोप्य मतदान भयो । पहिलो खुल्ला मतदानमा पक्ष/विपक्षमा १७/१७ र दोस्रो गोप्य मतदानमा पक्षमा १७ र विपक्षमा १६ मत आयो । अध्यक्ष मनमोहन मतदान गर्न गएनन् । अष्टलक्ष्मी शाक्य र राजेन्द्र श्रेष्ठलाई तटस्थ राखियो । जबकि उनीहरूले सन्धिको विपक्षमा मतदान गरेको भए सन्धि पास नहुन सक्थ्यो ।

सन्धि अनुमोदन हुने दिन बिहान ८ बजेदेखि बेलुका झण्डै आठ बजेसम्म एमालेको २८ औं बैठक तनावपूर्ण अवस्थामा बस्यो । जबकि सदन दिनको २ बजे बस्नुपर्ने थियो । संसदीय दलको बैठकमा हात हालाहालकै स्थिति आयो । कुर्सी हानाहान नै भयो । माधव नेपाल र केपी ओलीविरुद्ध चर्का नाराबाजी भयो । संसदीय दलको कार्यालयको मूलढोकामा ताला बन्द गरिएको थियो । त्यसैले नेपाल र ओलीसहित सांसदहरू झण्डै १५ मिनेटसम्म थुनिएका थिए । प्रहरीले दलको कार्यालयमा प्रवेश गरी भीड हटाउँदै ताला तोडेपछि ती सांसदहरू संसद् बैठकमा जान पाएका थिए ।

महाकाली बेच्ने/नबेच्ने छिनोफानो गर्न संसद्मा पनि मतदान भयो । तर महाकाली बेच्नेहरू नै बढी भए । २ सय २० जनाले महाकाली बेच्नुपर्छ भनेर र आठ जनाले विपक्षमा भोट हाले । मनमोहन अनुपस्थित रहे भने एमालेका २६, राष्ट्रियसभाका मनोनित ४ र राप्रपाका एक सांसदले मतदानमा भाग नै नलिए पनि महाकाली बेच्न हुन्न भनेर स्पष्ट अडान लिनै भने सकेनन ।

यतिसम्म कि सन्धि अनुमोदनका लागि दुइतिहाई मत पुर्‍याउन सत्तापक्षका अस्वस्थ सांसद्हरू राजदेव मोहित, भीमप्रसाद श्रेष्ठ र राष्ट्रियसभाका उपाध्यक्ष डि.के. शाही -जो वीर अस्पतालको आई.सी.यु.कक्षमा थिए) लाई समेत ल्याएर भोट हाल्न लगाइयो ।

महाकाली हडप्न भारतीय विदेश मामिलामन्त्री प्रणव मुखर्जी पटकपटक नेपाल आउने/जाने गर्थे । राजदूत केबी राजन त सन्धि पारित गराउन घरीघरी कांग्रेस-एमालेकहाँ धाउँथे । उनी सबैभन्दा बढी एमालेकहाँ पुग्थे । किनकि यो सन्धि पास गराउन एमालेलाई नै मनाउनु थियो । सत्तारुढ अरू दल त त्यसै पनि राजी थिए । त्यसैले राजन माधवलगायतका नेताहरूलाई घरीघरी भेट्थे । अन्ततः राजनले एमालेलाई मनाइछाडे । र, एमाले महाकाली सन्धि पास गर्न तयार भयो । एमाले र भारतीय दूतावासबीच सन्धि गराउनुअघि चिठीपत्र आदान-प्रदान भइरहन्थ्यो । राजनको चिठी आएपछि नै एमालेको केन्द्रीय कमिटीले त्यही चिठीलाई भारतसरकारको प्रतिबद्धता मानी महाकाली सन्धि अनुमोदन गर्ने निर्णय गर्दै संसदीय ह्वीप जारी गरेको थियो । -हेर्नुसः चिठ्ठी बक्समा ऋषिराज लम्सालद्वारा २०५३ सालमा लिखित 'महाकाली नदीबाट प्राप्त उपलब्धिको रक्षा गर्दै थप उपलब्धिको लागि संघर्ष गरौं !' पुस्तकबाट ) ।

२०५३ साउन ३२ गते शुक्रबार बसेको एमाले स्थायी कमिटी बैठकले सन्धिको पक्ष वा विपक्षमा कुनै पनि टिप्पणी वा विचार व्यक्त नगर्न पार्टी नेताहरू एवं सांसदहरूलाई निर्देशन दिएको थियो ।

यद्यपि एमालेले पहिले हस्ताक्षर भएको सन्धिको स्वागत र र्समर्थन गरिसकेको भए पनि सन्धि अनुमोदन गर्नेबारे पार्टीभित्र मत बाझिएपछि जनताको आँखामा छारो हाल्न २६ औं पू्र्ण बैठक बसी ओलीको संयोजकत्वमा अध्ययन कार्यदल बनाएको थियो । उक्त कार्यदलको प्रतिवेदन आउनु अघिसम्म सन्धिबारे कसैलाई केही नबोल्न साउन ३२ गतेको बैठकले नै हृवीप जारी गरेको थियो ।

ओली कार्यदलले २०५३ भदौ, १४ गते सन्धिबारे अध्ययन पूरा गरी केही दिनभित्र पार्टीलाई प्रतिवेदन बुझायो । उक्त कार्यदलले सन्धि सकारात्मक छ भनी प्रतिवेदन पेश गरेपछि एमालेलाई सन्धि अनुमोदन गर्न पूरै ढोका खुल्यो ।

२०५३ भदौ १७ गते आयोजित पत्रकार अन्तर्क्रियामा जारी वक्तव्यमा ओली प्रतिवेदनको प्रारम्भिक आधारमा एमालेले सन्धिको पुन ः स्वागत र र्समर्थन गर्दै संसद्को दुइतिहाइ बहुमतबाट अनुमोदन गर्न योग्य छ भनी उल्लेख गर्‍यो भने भदौ १९ देखि २४ गतेसम्म बसेको उसको केन्द्रीय कमिटीको २८ औं बैठकले ओली प्रतिवेदनलाई पारित गर्‍यो । उक्त बैठकमा अध्यक्ष मनमोहन अधिकारी, स्थायी कमिटीका सदस्य तुल्सीलाल अमात्य र देवराज घिमिरेबाहेक सबै उपस्थित थिए ।

उता २०५३ भदौ १५ गते शनिबार गोरखापत्र दैनिकको प्रथम पृष्ठमा प्रमुखताका साथ छापिएको समाचारमा नेपालका लागि अमेरिकी तत्कालीन राजदूत सान्द्रा भोगेलगेसाङले एमाले अध्यक्ष मनमोहन र महासचिव माधवलाई संसदीय दलको कार्यालय सिंहदरबारमा छुट्टाछुट्टै भेटेका थिए । उनीहरूबीच अर्ढाई घण्टासम्म कुराकानी भएको थियो । त्यसक्रममा महाकाली सन्धिबारे कुराकानी हुँदा राजदूत सान्द्राले नेपालमा आउन चाहने लगानीकर्ताहरूलाई विश्वास दिलाउन सक्नुपर्छ भनेका थिए । सान्द्राले विश्व बैंकका अध्यक्ष केही समयभित्रै नेपाल आउने सर्न्दर्भ उल्लेख गर्दै सबै प्रमुख राजनीतिक दलहरूबीच सहमति भइसकेपछि नेपाल-भारतबीच सम्पन्न महाकाली सन्धिबारे विवाद गरी नेपालको विश्वसनीयतामा शंका उब्जाउन नहुने विचार व्यक्त गरेका थिए । त्यसपछि नेपालले ती राजदूतलाई विश्वसनीयता गुमाउने छैनौं भनेका थिए ।

I hope Nepali COngress Leaders will not  be again in Singhadurbar and Baluwatar. If this thing happens, god knows how many more rivers they will sell to India.

http://www.krishnasenonline.org/janadisha/year7/issue175/cover.htm
isn't it the Maoist affiliated newspaper.
Dudh ko Sachi biralo
LOL

Nepali congress Most corrupt pani ho ani Corruption ko culture basayera Corrupt harulai sahara Dine party pani ho ! Natra Khumbahadur,Chiranjibiwagle,govindraj Joshi .... haru lai Kina Ticket Diyo ta?Corrupt Party ko list
1.Nepali Congress
2.CPN Maoist
3.RPP
4.CPN UML( UML Dherai sattama basna payeko chaina tesaile)
5.SAdbhawana( sabai bhanda Corrupt Culture Bokeko party)
6.Rest
Kasailai Chitta bujena ki?Nabujhne jhan bhrastachari ho!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Finally it looks like Nepal ko sojho janta has realized Nepali Congress Kartut's. I think they have punished Nepali Congress in this election for making our country one of the corrupted country in the world.

 

Do you all know that top leaders of Nepali Congress are all Millionare even in $$$$?

ए बले भाइ,

त्यो मिलिनायरहरूको खातापाता र त्यहाँको रकम पनि टाँस्न । अनि त्यो माओवादी लूटेराहरूले लुटेको र हजम बनाएको कुरा पनि लेख्नु है ।

यो माओवादी लुटेराहरूको पत्रीकालाई कपि पेष्ट गरी के साबित गर्न खोजेको होला यो वा सि एल बलबहादुर जमरकट्टेल ले !

विचार र तर्क दिने भए मौलिक लिएर देखा पर्न यार । नेपालका बैँक लूटेर, अफिस र घर लूटेर जनताको भाग खोसेर खाएर लाखौँ लाखलाई घरबार बिहीन बनाउने र १५००० को जीवन हरण गर्ने पातकी हत्याराहरूको वकालत गरेर अरूलाई बदमास ठहर्‍याउनुको कुनै तूक छैन । भ्रष्टहरू बदमास हुन , तर ती हत्यारा र देशलाई डाँकाले झैँ लुट्ने जल्लादहरू  भन्दा त राम्रा नै हुन ।

अब घरमा बसेर भारतीय विस्तारवाद मूर्दावाद भन अनि मुखर्जीको गेडा मोल्न भारतको निम्तो माग प्रचण्डेले जस्तो ।

 

असमान सन्धि खारेज गर जनता उफार- अनि सोनियाको पाउमा गएर  लम्पसार पर्। मलाई आइएसआइले किन्न खोजेको थियो तर म बिकिन भनेर इण्डियन च्यानलमा रोएर भारतीय दलाली गर्ने काम प्रचण्डेले आफ्नो १ वर्ष अघिको भारत भ्रमणमा गरिसक्यो अब हेरौँला भारतीय बिदेशमन्त्रीसंग मलाई भारत भ्रमणमा बोलाउन पर्‍यो भनेर निवेदन हालेको छ केरे के हुन्छ !

कांग्रेसले नदी बेच्यो , एमालेले महाकालीमा साँक्षी बस्यो अब त्यसो भए तेरो राजमा फिर्ता लिएर देखा , मौका पाएको छस् हेरम् । सबै असमान सन्धि, गोर्खा भर्ति बन्द गरेर देखा , खुट्टी देखेर पत्याइदिउँला !

 

धेरै उफ्रिन पर्दैन लूटेरा कम्युनिष्टे , हे्र्लास तेरो राजमा के गरी देखाउँदो रैछस् । हेरौँला महंगी, भारतसंगको सम्बन्ध, राजा ,सेना, शान्ति सुरक्षा आदिका बारेमा अहिले सम्म आँफैले उछालेको कुराले खनेको खाडलमा कम्युनिष्टे लूटेराहरूको के हाल हुनेछ ।

Sumedhu bro,

    Thanks for ur coment. For your kinf information, i want to let you know that Maoist did not killed 15000 people in Nepal. Most of them were killed (more than 70%) by goverment force such as by police and army.This is fact brother.

 

And what do you say about alll those corupted Congress leader such as Khum Bahadur Khadka, Govinda Raj Joshi, Chrinajivi, Sailaja Koirala and Girija himself. Do I have to tell you that how corrupted they are samedhu ji..

Do you want khume to be our prime minister or what?????He will sell whole Nepal to INdia...I hope u are not related with one of these corrupted Congress leader.