Good Things that we can Applaud:

1. Capitalistic Maoist: We should welcome their announcement for Private-Public Investment for development, Foreign Direct Investment(FDI) and support for Globalization. The decision for State being only the facilitator is encouraging.

2. Changing Bureaucracy: Removing Feudal, Corrupt and Lethargic Bureaucracy in Nepal is laudable. The total revamp in this sector will give people new hope. The cooperation and coordination between different ministries is a good way to progress.

3. Empowering People: this election many Women, Dalits, and Minorities won, this is a very positive sign that we Nepalese are moving ahead in positive direction, crushing Feudalism and caste barrier.

4. New Nepal: Definition might differ but we must agree we all need PEACE and PROSPEROUS NEPAL. Economically and politically strong Nepal.


Things to watch out for:
1. YCL: Maoist should control the intimidation and atrocities through their youth wing(YCL).

2. Tyranny: even though they have agreed on Democratic power, there shouldn't be dictatorship and tyranny. Stick to what you have Promised to the People, the 'Democratic Nepal"

3. Agreeing to Disagree: The opposition (NC/UML/MJF) if possible should join the government and coordinate in building prosperous Nepal. They shouldn't play dirty politics and jeopardize Nepal's future by looking at their own self interest. We should realize that if we cannot address the nation's interest at large we'll be a failed nation and even worst lead towards disintegration.

Being Compulsively Optimistic: I feel all the major political parties have learned their lessons. Now they should stop acting on their OWN SELF INTEREST and SHOULD FOCUS ON BUILDING NATION FOR BETTER.

Well said Geda-gudi bro.

thanks bro....its time we unite for same cause ...the cause of progress....lets discuss about ECONOMICAL CHANGE NOW!!
How to achieve it?

geda gudi, well thought out points.  who likes the communists and maoists?  i certainly don't.  however, which other party is out there to give hope for the poor and oppressed?  none!  i would like to think of the maoist in nepal as the democratic party, and the congress as the republican party here in the states.  * on a footnote, the majority of bloggers here are probably either pro-congress or pro-monarchy. am i not right?  lets not hide behind our biases.  we should realize that maoist are in power because it was the will of the majority of nepalis, and those majority were probably oppressed, dalits, minorities, and janjatis.  put yourself in their shoes, and maybe we can sense a bit of their despair.  enough was enough; people were sick of corrupt congress and uml leaders.  wait, dharya leu everyone >>> wait and see before you pass your judgements on the maoists.  it's their turn now >>> and if they mess up, the nepali people will speak their voices again !!!

jee so what is prachandas program tomorrow

geda_gudi Posted on 04-18-08 1:12 PM     Reply | Notify Admin

3. Agreeing to Disagree: The opposition (NC/UML/MJF) if possible should join the government and coordinate in building prosperous Nepal. They shouldn't play dirty politics and jeopardize Nepal's future by looking at their own self interest. We should realize that if we cannot address the nation's interest at large we'll be a failed nation and even worst lead towards disintegration. Being Compulsively Optimistic: I feel all the major political parties have learned their lessons. Now they should stop acting on their OWN SELF INTEREST and SHOULD FOCUS ON BUILDING NATION FOR BETTER.

 

my only question???

Why didn't the so-called maoist aka my term of "terrorists" joined hand with the Govt. in power to build prosperous Nepal in the past?

i don't think it's going anywhere toward  building a New Nepal.. infact it's gonna be downfall of already failed nation.                         as they say jun jogi aaye pani kaan chireko.. and there is one for we nepalese

bheda with no geda (heard this  in one of the post)

yb

 

 

 

Geda-gudi, nice thoughts there man. I am just satisfied that this election crushed the crap out of all the corrupted Nepali Congress politicians Govinda Raj Joshi and Khum Bdr. Khadka. It got eliminated for the time being, but people should always watch out though, since corruption doesnot know which politician is in which party right???t

But i am observing these moments in nepalease politics positively..........we can always give it a try right, things might turn out right, we never know

साझा मा रमिता हेरेर कहिले काहि के लाग्छ भने नि:
काग्रेस  र एमाले लाइ भोट् दिने त सबै बिदेस् मा बसिरा रैछन् |
र साझा मा भेला भै रन्थनिदा रहेछन!
आर्को चुनाब मा साझा बासिन्दा को भोट पनि गन्ति हुने जोड्दार माग राख्नु पर्ला

 ki kaso?

The THING that is BEST suitable will LASTs LONGER (e.g: Homo Sapien in the Earth)

Lets have positive attitude...we need to build Nepal, not a party!! We should come out of the political party mind frame and should think like a NEPALI!!

Lets hope for the best and be postive......Lets see what the Maoists will do.......They have the chance to build new Nepal......If they also come out as the other political party , lets go back to Nepal and kick there ass.......

Countrymen pls. read below article published in Times of India.

Deep Red in Nepal
20 Apr 2008, 0000 hrs IST,SWAPAN DASGUPTA
 

Forecasting an election is always hazardous, especially if it happens after 12 years of chaos. The mistake pundits and journalists invariably make is to equate their own preferences with the likely outcome. They then try to cover up an honest mistake with intellectual dishonesty, such as suggesting that the unforeseen outcome is actually a "positive development". Last week witnessed comic efforts by the Indian Government to atone for its miscalculations in Nepal. Ministers and mandarins who had banked on a fractured verdict did an abrupt U-turn and gushed over the impending coronation of Maoist leader Prachanda in Kathmandu. The onrush of platitudes included suggestions that the old order was decrepit and that Mammon will soon replace Mao as the presiding deity of the new rulers. The implication was clear: wait for the spirit of Deng Xiaoping to overwhelm Mao Zedong Thought. The dawn of a new wisdom was based on convenient omissions. South Block glossed over a European Union election observation report that "the lack of law and order and poor security environment contributed to a general atmosphere of fear and intimidation and at times undermined the right to campaign freely." In plain language it meant that the Maoists had bullied voters at gunpoint. It also ignored Prime Minister-designate Baburam Bhattarai's boast that the "election result is a beautiful fusion between the bullet and ballot." Maybe it is best to let bygones be bygones and allow the Maoists an opportunity to change their stripes. Unfortunately, if history is anything to go by, the prospects of those who capture power professing Marxism-Leninism transforming themselves instantly into honourable social-democrats, are extremely remote. Revolutionaries do see the light eventually, but not as long as the pioneers of the revolution are at the helm. Africa is littered with examples of radical nationalists who lost no time subverting the Constitution and turning their countries into one-party autocracies. Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe who "stole an election" last month followed a long tradition of self-professed Marxist-Leninists who believe 'once in power, always in power'. The transformation of infant democracies into totalitarian regimes follows a pattern. First, there is a united front against a decaying old order. In Nepal, the target is a hidebound monarchy and its emotional hold on the people. Prachanda wants the King out because he seeks uncluttered control over all symbols of Nepali nationhood. It's a precondition for building a personality cult around the new supreme leader. Even a constitutional monarchy will be a hindrance. Second, by a combination of threats and blandishments, rival parties are inveigled into a power-sharing arrangement centred on the hegemony of the big brother. This invariably leads to the decimation of the junior partners. If the erstwhile Six Party Alliance helps Prachanda mould a Constitution of his choice, they may as well opt for voluntary dissolution. Nepal will move towards de-facto one-party rule. Maoists can imbibe capitalism; they cannot stomach democracy. Finally, the all-important distinction between the state machinery and the "revolutionary" party is removed. One of the principal objectives of the Maoists is to undermine the professional Nepal Army by incorporating its People's Liberation Army into it. The "reformed" army will pledge its loyalty to President Prachanda and give Maoists the monopoly of fire power that is needed to consolidate political power. At present, the Maoists have just 33 per cent or so of the popular vote; it needs the army to deal with insolent Madhesis and difficult politicians. The Maoist takeover of Nepal is not part of any secret agenda. The Reds have been remarkably candid about what they want. The folly lies in others imagining they don't mean what they say.

For Nepalese poltics India is major problem.

If India does not change - nothing can happen.

If we want generate and sell electricity - where to sell.

Nepali economy has been suffered by Indian open boader system.

Miost had / need to show that they are near to India...How can development possible?

For Nepalese poltics India is major problem.

If India does not change - nothing can happen.

If we want generate and sell electricity - where to sell.

Nepali economy has been suffered by Indian open boader system.

Miost had / need to show that they are near to India...How can development possible?

Upendrajee, I think u need Zingkira.

 Come on Zingkira,I think u have sth to comment on upendrajee posting.