- http://kantipuronline.com/kolnews.php?&nid=145265

Shame !

 

End of over 10 (22 runs) - Deccan Chargers 130/0 (25 runs required) AC Gilchrist    100* (42b 9x4 9x6)      AM Nayar    1-0-22-0 VVS Laxman    22* (18b 3x4)      ST Jayasuriya    2-0-17-0
9.6	Nayar to Gilchrist, SIX, he's done it! Gilchrist has teed off here, he's picked up a short of a length ball and sent it into orbit with a massive swing of the bat, the ball sails over deep midwicket and he's got his 100 off 42 balls, the fastest of the competition, the home team may be Mumbai but the crowd is going wild, they're cheering for this hitting is simply superb
9.6	Nayar to Gilchrist, 1 wide, bowled full and wide outside off stump, Gilchrist chases it but misses, Asad Rauf calls it wide
Can he get 100 with a six? Gilchrist's on 94.
9.5	Nayar to Laxman, 1 run, full ball on middle stump, Laxman nudges the ball towards the leg side for a single
9.4	Nayar to Gilchrist, 1 run, now Gilchirst hits the ball straight past the bowler and Kulkarni runs to his left and makes a fantastic save on the boundary with one hand, he keeps his balance to stay inside the rope
9.3	Nayar to Gilchrist, SIX, the length is full now and Gilchrist launches it off the front foot over extra cover, that was hit flat but the ball screams over the boundary, he moves into the 90s, breath-taking hitting
9.2	Nayar to Gilchrist, SIX, well no one has learnt, you cannot bowl even a fraction short to Gilchrist, Nayar pitches short and Gilchirst dispatches him with the pull over deep backward square leg
9.1	Nayar to Laxman, 1 run, strays on to the pads and Laxman leans across to flick the ball to deep square leg for a single
Nayar comes on to face the music from Gilchrist.

Well, it was part of the regime, if you go to the history or raja and maharaja or emperors, autocrats and dictatorships, you will find similarities. They rule and they misuse the power for personal gain. In democratic system there is check and balance.

It is not new but we are exaggerating now because we got more freedom to open our mouth against the KING. I have a question to you all, when the Maoist were in jungle and you were living in those area where the Maoist had the greatest influence and terrorized, were you able to go against them. Your answer will be NO. So you bow to the power and do things to survive.

Yes, long term ruler destroys the nation we can lined hundreds here.

Kingship should be abolished but not giving power to Communist, who had killed over 16,000 and those killed were innocent peoples, I do not think Mahendra, Birendra and Gyanendra all together killed that many to keep the Panchyat alive.

Now we are doing the same as we did in past, we just following the path of Nepalese culture, hit hard who is going down fall, express you anger to get relieve yourself. We are doing it either knowingly or unknowingly. But it is the trend of Nepali culture. I am

Do not hit me saying you are mandale, I am against communism rules.

JUST HOPE WE WILL GET THE CONSTITUTION THAT LEADS TO DEMOCRATIC PATH NOT IN FAVOUR OF COMMUNISM. A COMMUNIST REPUBLIC NATION.

 

funny some morons dont know what they r posting.......cricket in this thread....... 

Name: LIberty For All Subject: Do you mean m-o-r-o-n? Response to:   Origin and uses Moron was originally an English scientific term, coined in 1910 by psychologist Henry H. Goddard from the Greek word moros, which meant "dull" (as opposed to "sharp"), and used to describe a person with a mental age located between eight and 12 on the Binet scale. It was once applied to people with an IQ of 51-70, being superior in one degree to "imbecile" (IQ of 26-50) and superior in two degrees to "idiot" (IQ of 0-25). The word moron, along with others including "retarded", "idiotic", "imbecilic", "stupid", and "feeble-minded", was formerly considered a valid descriptor in the psychological community, though these words have all now passed into common slang use, exclusively in a derogatory context.
Courtesy: www.wikipedia.com