I am looking for a good webhosting that can handle a connection of at lease a 100 users at a single time...any suggestions//

 Whats your uptime, bandwidth and price range? And what kind of application will you be running?

Khate2009,

Try QualityHostOnline.com and see if that meets your needs. They have been hosting sites for me for quite a while and I have been satisfied with their service.

By the way, love your name!

khatey2009,
I've a link if you are only interested, else don't need to click it. It's down below.
You can get 2000 visitors at a time, that's the most it can handle for you on their shared hosting.
You pay as low as $3 a month if you follow my referal link below. But if you don't want me to earn anything off my referral, that's fine, you'll end up paying little over $3 which is around almost $4 . It's upto you.
Here every first time customer gets benefits off first time referral. I hope you want to get that one as well.

Some of the features available are: 

    Superior Support. Powerful Hosting.
    Unlimited Space & Bandwidth
    Host Unlimited Domains
    Unlimited E-mail Accounts
    Free Domain
    cPanel Control Panel
    $75 Google Adwords Credit
    Free Site Builders
    Free Online Stores
    WordPress, Gallery and More
    they don't outsource—EVER (local support)

CLICK HERE TO SIGNUP FOR HOSTMONSTER.COM

Just get on with them. All my clients are happy and I have them with hostmonster.

solta, get a vps service 

he's just asking for 100 visitors at a time

 my bad . bluehost is good 

torpay lai bluehost ra hostmonster euta ho bhanney samma ko gyan chaina rahecha..

100 users at same time is huge load. You are technically talking about millions of hits per day. Did you really mean 100 users at same time????? I don't think any shared webhosting like hostmonster or its parent Bluehost can support it.

You would need multiple dedicated servers in web farm to support it. On high level, I would say one dedicated web server for 10,000 hits per day. so, if you are talking about millions of hits per day then you are talking about hundreds of servers.

DO YOU REALLY MEAN 100 USERS AT SAME TIME?????

bkshres, hostmonster can handle 2000 visitors at a time. that's the bandwidth cap allowed most to this shared hosting. I've personally discussed this matter with them. I'm not blowing some random made-up stories here.

100 users could literally mean one hundred users hanging on to the site a day same time. Don't really need to be 1 million users per day. I don't know where did you get that idea that if millions visitors visit a day , it turns in to 100 visitors at a same time. It's very weird. Besides, the fact is visitors load depends upon the structure of site as well. Say if the site is serving just around 50-60KB , it really isn't a big load to serve 100 users at a time. Average visitors don't even spend more than 3 minutes per page. Say 1 minute a page. And, if the site is just for information rather than dynamic nature like those news sites, 100 visitors at a time is easy come, easy go.

Now, if you can imagine that all that numbers of visitor not occuring at the same time possibly, guess what , shared hosting today can handle more than 20,000 unique visitors a day. But if the site tends to grow in terms of number of visitors at given time, definitely one needs to upgrade to better dedicated grid servers.. and it'll cost heckuva dohlaaa

>>host monster can handle 2000 visitors at a time.
@bittertruth
What is that supposed to mean? 2000 visitors at a given second? minute? hour? 

@howard, it's better you ask that question to the original poster. if it's 'at a time' or 'per second'

@bk, technically you are right. But, 8,640,000 visitors per day?? do you think someone in sajha would come and ask here requiring that capacity to deal with deal with that amount of visitors? you are just not getting a simple question asked by a novice user. I was just giving him a simple answer. You guys are just making it complicated with your strict theoritical equation.

He must have wondered about the 100 visitors per second.. at its max.  It doesn't mean there has to be continuous flow of that number of visitors per second like your 'Math'. I'm pretty much sure, he's talking about peak. Say, all week it's slow but weekend, how about most of the visitors say 100 accessing the site at the same time. Hope you get that.