Here is the full text of the petition:
__________
Date: April 25,2006
To: His Excellency Ronen Sen
The Indian Embassy, Washington, DC
CC: Secretary General Kofi A. Anan, (The United Nations)
Assistant Secretary Richard Boucher, (US Department of State)
His Excellency John Bruton, (European Union Ambassador to the US)
His Excellency Kedar Bhakta Shrestha, (Nepalese Ambassador to the US)
His Excellency Zhou Wenzhong (Chinese Ambassador to the US)
His Excellency Jehangir Karamat (Pakistani Ambassador to the US)
His Excellency Bernard Goonetilleke (Sri Lankan Ambassador to the US)
His Excellency Shamsher Chowdhury (Bangladeshi Ambassador to the US)
Dear Ambassador Sen:
We are professionals and students from Nepal residing in the United States and we are not
affiliated with any political parties or groups. We are alarmed and concerned at the recent turn of
events in Nepal and we hereby write to your Excellency to request India to take immediate steps to
diffuse and restrain the current political turmoil and prevent the escalation of Maoist insurgency.
We are seriously concerned that unless this is done immediately, the extreme left wing party will
hijack the democracy movement for their own goals thereby leading to much more chaos, turmoil,
and bloodshed in Nepal.
Recognizing the importance of peace between neighboring countries, reaffirming also that States
have sovereign rights over their own territory, we the concerned citizens and friends of Nepal,
request India to take a more balanced role in negotiating with the Nepali party leaders to behave
responsibly and stop intensifying the civil unrest. We believe that extreme concessions to the mob
of demonstrators are not fair to all the Nepalese people. However, India's recent reluctance in
containing the movement in Nepal that threatens to be overtaken by extremist elements, added to
its role in the Maoist war in Nepal, leads us to question India's proper understanding of Nepal's
political problem and her commitment to resolve it.
Aware that the King has given away his executive power to the parties and restored Parliament, we
believe that in order to prevent further escalation of conflict and volatility in Nepal, the
international community, namely India, should apply firm pressure on the seven party alliances
(SPA) to prevent extremism from ascending to power. Also, the Indian government should
immediately demand concession from the Maoists. An immediate short term concession from the
Maoists is to declare a ceasefire while the long term concession is to renounce armed struggle and
violence. Further, we believe that the Maoists leaders should be brought to justice before the
International Tribunal. Such actions from India are urgently needed not only for the short-term
settlement, but also for the long-term success of democracy in Nepal and for the regional peace
and stability in the SAARC nations.
While the international community witnessed thousands of people demonstrating against the King,
we believe that the current mass of demonstrators in Nepal is not representative of the views of the
majority of Nepalese both in Nepal and abroad. Contrary to the prevailing view, reliable
information indicates that the Maoists had infiltrated the movement and had fueled and funded the
demonstrators for their own political advantage. Reports from Nepal indicate that angry mobs had
threatened ordinary citizens of Nepal with violence to participate in the movement and to back
them up financially. Also, there have been reports of mobs attacking and looting shops including
protesters flagrantly trying to provoke the security forces to instigate further violence, discord and
turmoil. Clearly, these are not the signs of a "peaceful" or "democratic" movement. Therefore,
the presumption that the demands of the current crowds in the capital are the demands of the
"Nepalese people" is untrue and false.
We believe that violence and the threat of violence is a breach of peace and an infringement of
people's fundamental rights of "life, liberty and property." We also believe that the King has
historically, traditionally and religiously been a symbol of unity and peace for the vast silent
majority of various multi-ethnic groups of people in Nepal. However, the sovereignty of the
people cannot be monopolized by any one institution - Palace or the Maoist. We firmly believe
that the "voice of the people" is represented by an elected parliament and not by an angry mob of
demonstrators. Additionally, yielding to their demands is nothing short of depriving the rest of the
people of their right to be heard. Thus, in such a scenario, statements by your government
supporting "democratic forces" in Nepal could send wrong signals.
We believe that the Maoist insurgency was one of the main destabilizing forces in Nepal that has
contributed to the current political chaos and has gained momentum into the SPA demonstrations.
Reaffirming the importance of peace and stability in Nepal, we are anguished and appalled at India
for sheltering and abetting the Nepali Maoist guerilla leaders in Indian soil when they are branded
as terrorists by the international community and are wanted by Nepal government for treason and
high crimes. As you are aware, the Maoists problem has wreaked havoc in this small land-locked
nation. More than 13 thousand people have lost their lives and several thousands have become
displaced. The Maoist insurgency in Nepal has devastated Nepal's fledgling economy and
completely thwarted development. Recognizing India's repeated commitment to peace and
democracy in Nepal, we are surprised why India has not done more to contain the activities of
Maoist who clearly use Indian soil for their terrorist activities against Nepal.
Noting further that while officially, New Delhi brands Nepali Maoists as terrorists, we fail to
understand why India in recent times is giving a "soft corner" to the Maoists. Just recently, the
senior BJP leader and former Indian Home Minister, L. K. Advani, claimed that the UPA
government of India has a "soft corner" for Maoists in Nepal and warned that extending support to
their insurgency could prove harmful to both India and Nepal. Referring to that meeting, Advani
declared, "I am disappointed by the PM's failure to mention the well-known link between Maoist
insurgents in Nepal and the Naxal outfits in India. I suspect that this is because of the UPA's soft
corner for Maoists in Nepal. This is a dangerous policy." It is thus clear that even the Indian party
leaders are calling for the Indian government not to shelter the Maoists of Nepal. If India
continues to shelter the Maoists of Nepal then India also is doomed to go the way of Nepal. We
believe that the King can help prevent that eventuality and India needs to support him as well as
the SPA in restoring democracy in Nepal.
We Nepalese are proud of our unique heritage, culture, and glorious history. We deplore the
violence caused by the Maoists activities and the current demonstrators in Nepal, and we ask
urgently for the government of India to:
1) Negotiate with the SPA and the Maoists to cease demonstrations and restore
peoples' right for peace
2) Pressure the SPA to reject forming a constituent assembly
3) Stop sheltering the Nepali Maoist leaders in Indian soil and send them out of India
4) Demand the Maoist leaders to opt for a ceasefire, renounce violence and armed
struggle, and bring them to Justice for their atrocities
Therefore, in the best interest of Nepal's sovereignty, sustenance and security, we respectfully
petition the government of India not to help the Maoists overtly or covertly to come into power and
pressure the SPA to hold general elections and ask them to discard constituent assembly in Nepal.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
