[VIEWED 126324
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
LSU_tiger
Please log in to subscribe to LSU_tiger's postings.
Posted on 08-20-07 2:54
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Welcome to the college Football Action Pck'em Contest 2007. Just Give a shot...and Support your team. Good luck picking...
|
|
|
|
Cowboys
Please log in to subscribe to Cowboys's postings.
Posted on 10-15-07 6:54
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
himalayandude
Please log in to subscribe to himalayandude's postings.
Posted on 10-15-07 7:36
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
mampaka
Please log in to subscribe to mampaka's postings.
Posted on 10-15-07 7:59
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
LSU-Tiger bro, I think it would better to put those scores in percentage correctly predicted not the total sumof correctly predicted. That will allow you to compare prediction accuracy of a guy who participates in all weeks, with another guy that participates in only few weeks. Just a thought.... thanks a lot for keeping it up brother........I am eager to see the Tigers Vs. Tigers battle this weekend....War Damn Eagle!!!!!!!!!! But i tell you this weekend your Tigers will win.....we'll see.
|
|
|
PeterGriffin
Please log in to subscribe to PeterGriffin's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 12:04
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
LSU_tiger
Please log in to subscribe to LSU_tiger's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 12:30
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
mampaka bro, I think you got a point.. Here you go.
|
|
|
Jonny
Please log in to subscribe to Jonny's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 7:50
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
LSU Bro, Thanks for updating the scoreboard. I understand your point on the percentage table but I think it will not be fair to people who have participated your poll every week rather than just one or two weeks. Also, if someone who just participates on next week poll gets 100%, than it won’t make sense for them to participate again as they already won the poll. Just a thought. And, sorry about your tigers.
|
|
|
Veg Tiger
Please log in to subscribe to Veg Tiger's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 7:57
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
mampaka
Please log in to subscribe to mampaka's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 9:34
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
LSU_Tiger, I think Jonny' point is right too, but in that way no any new people will have incentive to join the thread and make prediction here. I don't think these college football pundits will stop predicting just becasue they already got 100%.That will further encourage them to make more prediction and show how knowledgeable they are. Further, just by addting the total number, the whole poll does not make sense to ony those who have been participating it every week, but people who missed posting their prediction of a week, just because of mid term, final etc, it will not fair. So, i think the % thing is the best one to measure people's prediction accuracy. Even if somebody just participates only one week, and gets 100% right, its good for him becoz ESPN may want to hire such as guy... Lee Corso and Kirk Herbstreight may be fired then.....just jocking....
|
|
|
blue_moon
Please log in to subscribe to blue_moon's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 10:15
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
LSU_tiger
Please log in to subscribe to LSU_tiger's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 12:51
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I totally unerstand jonny and mampaka bros' point. So next week on I will post both the total points and percentage. But ranking will be based on the total points. I guess that will be a fair game. :) Since we need some recognistion for those who plays every week and dont want any week off no matter what we got in the school , mid terms and stuffs or our fav team loses. We roll every week.
|
|
|
utousucks
Please log in to subscribe to utousucks's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 2:53
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
LSU_Tiger bro, why don't we do it the way we are doing it for NFL? Have 2 different percentages. The first one will include overall win - loss percentage (if you missed any pick any week, that's counted a loss). The second percentage will include the win-loss percentage only for the weeks that one participated in. At least this way you get the big and the small picture, hopefully both parties happy.
|
|
|
utousucks
Please log in to subscribe to utousucks's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 2:59
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
LSU_Tiger bro, I did not read your previous comment on time. Your suggestions sounds great, using the ranking based on total points. No need for two percentages. Great work so far..
|
|
|
utousucks
Please log in to subscribe to utousucks's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 2:59
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Last edited: 16-Oct-07 02:59 PM
|
|
|
Himalaya178
Please log in to subscribe to Himalaya178's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 3:52
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Did I really missed 2 weeks. I guess I did eh......Anyway sathi haru yar mero % ramro bhayo bhanera RISH nagara na yar Pleaseeeeeeee...Aaba bata ma pheri participate hunchu yar....heheheheheheheheh
Himalayan dude lai ta Jitechu....himalayan dude lai weekends ko khasi baddi bhako jasto chha...Ani AX lai ta Kasari garne...Chaubisai ghanta tyo remote samatera baschha bajjiya......
|
|
|
daalo
Please log in to subscribe to daalo's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 3:56
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
mampaka
Please log in to subscribe to mampaka's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 4:31
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
LSU Bro. My suggestion would be that do not rank'em one way or another. It would not really logical to rank'em according to total points, since the percentage prediction is the one and only universal accuracy criteria in evaluating forecasting or prediction capacity/power. So, the fair one is to list'em alphabetically in table according to the Sajha ID.
|
|
|
Hawaldar
Please log in to subscribe to Hawaldar's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 5:08
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Week 8 Picks:- (2) South Florida at Rutgers ------------> South Florida Michigan State at (1) Ohio State -------> Ohio State (17) Auburn at (4) LSU----------------> LSU (5) Oklahoma at Iowa State------------> OK Vanderbilt at (6) South Carolina -------> South Carolina (15) Florida at (7) Kentucky -----------> Florida Mississippi State at (9) West Virginia---> West Virginia (10) Oregon at Washington-------------> Oregon (12) California at UCLA ---------------> Cal (13) Kansas at Colorado---------------> Kansas (14) USC at Notre Dame --------------> USC (24) Texas Tech at (16) Missouri-------> Mizzou (21) Tennessee at Alabama--------------> Bama (22) Texas at Baylor --------------------> Texas (23) Cincinnati at Pittsburgh -------------> Cinci (25) Michigan at Illinois -----------------> Illinois
|
|
|
LSU_tiger
Please log in to subscribe to LSU_tiger's postings.
Posted on 10-16-07 11:20
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
(2) South Florida at Rutgers ------------>Rutgers (have to say it) Michigan State at (1) Ohio State -------> Michigan State (17) Auburn at (4) LSU----------------> LSU (5) Oklahoma at Iowa State------------> Oklahoma Vanderbilt at (6) South Carolina -------> South Carolina (15) Florida at (7) Kentucky -----------> Kentucky Mississippi State at (9) West Virginia---> West Virginia (10) Oregon at Washington-------------> Oregon (12) California at UCLA ---------------> Cal (13) Kansas at Colorado---------------> Colorado (14) USC at Notre Dame --------------> USC (24) Texas Tech at (16) Missouri-------> Texas Tech (21) Tennessee at Alabama--------------> Alabama (22) Texas at Baylor --------------------> Texas (23) Cincinnati at Pittsburgh -------------> Cinci (25) Michigan at Illinois -----------------> Illinois
Last edited: 18-Oct-07 12:00 PM
|
|
|
batas
Please log in to subscribe to batas's postings.
Posted on 10-17-07 12:13
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
My Picks:- (2) South Florida at Rutgers ------------> South Florida Michigan State at (1) Ohio State -------> Ohio State (17) Auburn at (4) LSU----------------> LSU (5) Oklahoma at Iowa State------------> Oklohoma Vanderbilt at (6) South Carolina -------> South Carolina (15) Florida at (7) Kentucky -----------> Kentucky Mississippi State at (9) West Virginia---> West Virginia (10) Oregon at Washington-------------> Oregon (12) California at UCLA ---------------> California (13) Kansas at Colorado---------------> Kansas (14) USC at Notre Dame --------------> USC (24) Texas Tech at (16) Missouri-------> Missouri (21) Tennessee at Alabama--------------> Alabama (22) Texas at Baylor --------------------> Texas (23) Cincinnati at Pittsburgh -------------> Cincinati (25) Michigan at Illinois -----------------> Michigan
|
|
|
Himalaya178
Please log in to subscribe to Himalaya178's postings.
Posted on 10-17-07 12:33
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Osborne returns as Nebraska interim AD
AX dude are you HAPPY NOW you got your Tom Osbourne back in Track ...I think I surf on internet anf flip channels more than you did now.......
no offense dawg
|
|