[VIEWED 15806
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
aabha_in_us
Please log in to subscribe to aabha_in_us's postings.
Posted on 01-07-07 8:47
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I have hobby of photography. I want to buy a Digital SLR camera and lense set. I want to use this for my personal photography as well as professional (participate in competitions and Exhibitions, sell if possible). Which model should I by. Please advise, experts.
|
|
|
|
Khaobaadi
Please log in to subscribe to Khaobaadi's postings.
Posted on 01-11-07 8:37
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
So far this my favourite lens I have used for shooting portraits. Amazing contrast, great auto focus speed for high action shots...and constant apeture (smallest available "F" number) throught the zoom range of 80-200mm. Instantly gives you the credibility of a serious photographer in public (dont be suprised to see people staring at you in public if you are dangling one of these anywhere you go.)
|
|
|
Khaobaadi
Please log in to subscribe to Khaobaadi's postings.
Posted on 01-11-07 8:41
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Here is my examle image shot with the same lens late last year in Toronto. http://flickr.com/photos/clairvoyant/302176454/
|
|
|
Khaobaadi
Please log in to subscribe to Khaobaadi's postings.
Posted on 01-11-07 8:42
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
R http://flickr.com/photos/clairvoyant/302176454/
|
|
|
sayami
Please log in to subscribe to sayami's postings.
Posted on 01-11-07 8:46
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I do not agree that Nikon is better. You got this idea from people from Nikon forum. Try yourself. Then you will realise it. .
|
|
|
sayami
Please log in to subscribe to sayami's postings.
Posted on 01-11-07 8:51
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
. They are all canons. .
|
|
|
Khaobaadi
Please log in to subscribe to Khaobaadi's postings.
Posted on 01-11-07 8:53
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I never read Nikon forums...probably the most boring thing to do when I can expriment with the equipments on my own and see the results myself.
|
|
|
Khaobaadi
Please log in to subscribe to Khaobaadi's postings.
Posted on 01-11-07 9:09
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Most of them are using Canon because of the simple fact.. inside the staduim there will be a constant and stable lighting situation and the lighting variation is mininal (almost like a studio) .... therefore neither the camera nor the photographer has to do much of adjustments interms of camera settings. Try this anywhere where there are no overhead lights (like staduim or studio) providing constant lighting...
|
|
|
divdude
Please log in to subscribe to divdude's postings.
Posted on 01-11-07 11:36
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I think lenses are most important for making good pictures. If you have no idea about SLR photography you should get Nikon D40 or the equivalent. Invest on good lenses. Once you start to to feel quite comfortable using camera metering and manual mode you should shift to Nikon D200(or perhaps D2Xs!!). good luck.
|
|
|
DC_virus
Please log in to subscribe to DC_virus's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 1:14
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
From my experience...mostly through the net and some by hands on practice....theres good and bad points for both Nikon and Canons.... Canons are the best for sports photography...thats why in almost all sports...you'll see big white lenses all around the arena. Nikon is better than canon in low light/compromised lighting stages.
|
|
|
m2000ad
Please log in to subscribe to m2000ad's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 2:26
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I think all comes to 2 things: Budget and needs (what type of pictures will you be shooting). I don't have Nikon experience, but I have been using D20 for the last 3 years in clubs (talk about changing lighting!) and I am quite happy with what I get. Also I don't have a fast lens (17-85 mm f/4 - 5.6).
|
|
|
m2000ad
Please log in to subscribe to m2000ad's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 2:27
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Meant to say Canon 20D, not D20 in my earlier post.
|
|
|
sayami
Please log in to subscribe to sayami's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 6:26
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
. Hi Camera experts, Find which cameras were used ? .
|
|
|
Riten
Please log in to subscribe to Riten's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 8:23
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Hmmm... Kodak use-and-throw available at your friendly CVS store for $7.99 but also available at your neighborhood Dollar store for, yes you got it, one dollaaaa?
|
|
|
directX
Please log in to subscribe to directX's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 8:56
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Guys, stop fighting over brands. You need to understand that photography is an art, without proper knowledge of lighting, composition etc,. won't help you make good picture. Camera is just a tool to capture that moment... and digital makes it much easier these days if you know post processing ....... sayami, I assume those pictures are taken with canon because it is named as testcanon and I can not see EXIF data..........good work though.... megu na banlagu photo post yana disan....
|
|
|
aabha_in_us
Please log in to subscribe to aabha_in_us's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 11:43
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Thanks guys. I got a lot idea about the camera. And now I am more confused....Canon or Nikon? My plan is to spend upto $1700. Anyway, I will review all response again and find out. Additional suggestions are wecome.
|
|
|
sayami
Please log in to subscribe to sayami's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 11:58
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
1700$... It is more than enough.. EOS 400 D + 17-85 IS USM Digitale SLR, 10.1 MP, 2.5" LCD, EOS Integrated Cleaning System, inkl. 17 - 85 IS USM and some GB memory cards.
|
|
|
divdude
Please log in to subscribe to divdude's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 12:08
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
It comes down to what kind of pictures you want to take. 1. For Landscapes , potraits etc Nikon D80 or canon 30D either will do. Just get good wide lenses. If you want to shoot birds and wild life I recommend canon because they have Image Stabilaization technology for lot cheaper than nikons vibration reduction i.e the technology to allow you to take handheld shots in low shutter speeds. And canon has 100-400mm Ltype lens for reasonable price and is extremely sharp as well. Both nikon and canon are very good camera makers so you wont go much wrong in choosing either of those. I like nikons BTW and own a D80 myself and I am loving it (although i wish it didin have those stupid modes on dial you know those automatic ones). Good luck.
|
|
|
sayami
Please log in to subscribe to sayami's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 12:12
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
. Hi divdude Try Canon 400D. I am sure you will sell your Nikon for haif price.
|
|
|
sayami
Please log in to subscribe to sayami's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 12:16
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
and you start talking Cononese from Canonland.
|
|
|
divdude
Please log in to subscribe to divdude's postings.
Posted on 01-12-07 12:35
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
hehe sayami I think i am gonna stick to my D80 400D doesnt even have a programmable Auto ISO No spot metering Mirror lock-up buried in a custom menu no offence yo.
|
|