Firstly, I support the protest again autocratic Gyane and his puppet government. But kantipur media's new about the protest program is very unethical and questionable. This unethical broadcast has given bad name to the protest program itself. Kantipur should realize that and stop the false bogus news. Some of the false news spread by kantipur

1) On ocasions they have show clip and pictures of 2046 as current event to misguide people.
2) On ocasions they have used clips of previous day as news even of current day.
3) Most of their mass meeting pictures are Photoshoped. ( Please see the attached picture of today, if you look care fully you can see copy of paste of same person at many places)


** KANTIPUR PLEASE REPORT FACT AS NEWS NOT PROPOGANDA, YOU ARE BRINIGING IN BAD NAME TO THE WHOLE PUBLIC PROTEST BY THIS UNETHICAL MOVE **

Anyway I give up may be I was wrong, but I am being cautious with kantipur given their past track. I can believe the news in Himal, Jana Astha, Samachar Patra by just reading their article. But for kantipur I never do until I verify from some other source.

The loss of faith with Kantipur was whole CIAA episode they played. It was Kantipur who started the strom of CIAA by diging in Chiranjivi Wagle's ilegal wealth and forcing CIAA to take action eventhough Wagle was minister at that time.

But when Kishor Shirowa got in trouble for Kantipur TV deal they took complete U turn and started criticizing everything about CIAA. For me that is not professional journalism.

But I guess in the world of commercial journalism these kind of things happen.

I just hate biased journalism like FOX .. or any one else

we need to realize that everything going on in nepal is a big indian propaganda and kantipur publications has been their biggest mouthpiece. it is also worth mentioning that most of the international news wire receive their news about nepal via india / indian publications.

so go figure!

General, thanks for correction. Yes Kailash Shiroya not Kishor Shiroya.

I was just trying to be over cautious about preventing kantipur or leaders or maoist or any one else to use this movement for their personal benifit.

The out come should be a all party goverment and voting on constitutional assembly.

We nepalese only have right to choose what we want, not SPA not Maoist not King or not any one else.

"We nepalese only have right to choose what we want, not SPA not Maoist not King or not any one else"
SPA, maoistis and their sympathizers and the royalists are allll nepalis.100%. the solution is to come to a coherent conclusion between teh three interests...actually monarchy is obsolete. whether we like it or not, SPA and moaists will be our leaders in teh future. so either one of you who keeps complaining about SPA and moiasts, come out and lead the country; natra bhane stop khutta taning one another, stop complaining about corruption and learn to cooperate with what comes in our plates....

I think Prajanatra must have been laid off by kantipur...I think he is trying to revenge kantipur..haha

Well lfc123, i agree they are 100% nepalese, tara they do not have right to dictate what is right for us. They should let us vote on what we want, and serve us as a leader.

Not dictate us like Shah and Ranas have been done and are doing.

SPAs are our leaders, prachanda and baburam are our leaders..i mean they will be.. eventually. as long as they serve the interests of our country and the peoples, i will support them. if maoists establish a communist regime, then like i said before, its really over. we wil lbe worse off then king's regime. if they do agree to co-oprate with parties, we have a long, road hard ahead of us, but we will still be on our way up.
well mr. prajatantra, i gotta go.
good night!

*प्रजातन्त्रजी माथीको तश्विरमा मानिसहरुको सहभागितालाई ठूलो देखाउन फोटशपको दुरुपयोग भएको छैन भन्ने कुरा त तपाईंले बुझिसक्नुभयो। तर प्रकाशन पत्रकारिता - प्रेस र अनलाइनमा फोटोको अवलवकनलाई प्रभावकारी बनाउन केहि चमकधमक गर्ने छुट अवश्य छ। विश्वको जुनसुकै संचार माध्यामले पनि तश्विर प्रकाशन गर्दा सामान्य सम्पादनका लागि फोटोशपको प्रयोग गर्न सक्छन र गरिरहेका हुन्छन, तर खिचिएको तश्विरको गुणस्तर हेरेर कम बेसी सम्पादन हुन्छ वा कहिलेकाहीं दुरुस्तै छापिएको पनि हुनसक्छ।

*टेलिभिजन पत्रकारितामा सबै घटनाहरुको फुटेज प्राप्त गर्नु झण्डै असम्भव कुरा हो। त्यसैले मिल्दोजुल्दो विषयमा आर्काइभबाट पूराना फुटेजहरु निकालेर प्रशारण गर्नु पूर्णतया स्वभाविक हुन्छ। बीबीसी, सिएनएन, अल-जजीरा जस्ता नेटवर्कले पनि प्रसस्त मात्रामा पूराना फुटेजहरु देखाइरहेका हुन्छन। र यसमा टेलिभिजनको साधन स्रोतको पनि भूमिका हुन्छ। समाचारको उद्गमस्थलबाट, घटना घटेको समयमै लिइएको दृश्य भएसम्म कसैले आर्काइभ खोज्न चाहदैन। नभएपछि मिल्दोजुल्दो फुटेज प्रशारण गर्नु स्वभाविक हो। पूराना तश्विर र श्रव्य सामाग्रीको पुन:प्रकाशन/प्रशारण सन्दर्भ हेरेरे पत्रिका,अनलाइन र रेडियोमा समेत हुन्छ।

*तश्वरमा फोटोशप मात्रै होइन,समाचारको टेक्स्ट, श्रव्य/दृश्य सामाग्रीको पीच/लेवल/ब्राइटनेस/जुम/ मिक्सिङ/काँटछाँट आदि गुणस्तर वृद्धि र सम्पादनका लागि विभिन्न शफ्टवेयरको प्रयोग गर्नु व्यवसायिक पत्रकारिताको एउटा पक्ष हो।

*जहाँसम्म अख्तियार प्रकरणको कुरा छ, नीजी लगानीको पत्रिका भएकाले आफ्नो संलग्नता भएका प्रकरणहरुमा संस्थागत स्वार्थ संरक्षण गर्ने क्रममा केहि सूचनालाई लुकाउने वा तोडमोड गर्ने काम कान्तिपुरले नगरेको होला भन्न सकिन्न। यस्तो काम पश्चिमा प्रकाशनहरुबाट पनि भैरहेको हुन्छ। खाली कुन स्तरमा भन्ने कुरा महत्वपूर्ण हो। यदि अति नै गरियो भने सम्वन्धित मिडियाले आफै साख गुमाउन पुग्छ। स्तर निर्धारण गर्ने काम लक्षित दर्शक, श्रोता, पाठकको हो। तर निजी मिडियामा conflict of interest बढिनै आइपर्नसक्छ।

यसो भन्दैमा कैलाश सिरोहियामाथी कारवाही गरिएकाले कान्तिपुर राजा विरोधी निक्लेको हो भनि गम्भीर आरोप लगाउनु वा संशय गर्नु त्यहाँ कार्यरत सैयौं पत्रकारहरुको व्यवसायिकतामाथी लांछना लगाउनु हो। कान्तिपुर नेपालका शिक्षित युवा पेशेवरहरुको एउटा प्रतिनिधी संस्था हो त्यसैले उसका प्रकाशन/ प्रशारणमा युवा जनमत अभिव्यक्त भैरहेको हुन्छ भन्ने वुझ्न जरुरी छ। गल्ति औंल्याउनु अवश्य पनि उचित छ तर हचुवा आरोपहरु लगाउनु युक्तिसंगत हुँदैन। अप्रमाणित विवादास्पद कुराहरु उठाएर कान्तिपुरका सबल पक्षहरुलाई ओझेलमा पार्दा त्यहाँका पेशेवरहरुको मिहिनेतको उपहास हुन जान्छ।

(पुनश्च: माथीका कुराहरु कान्तिपुरका एकजना नियमित पाठकका नितान्त व्यक्तिगत बिचार हुन। यसमा सहमत असहमत हुनेले न्यूयुजरलाई आफ्ना जवाफमा नतान्नुहोला, धन्यवाद)

Prajatantra, just by putting the name as prajatantra and reiterating the belief in democracy doesn't make u the democrat. You got to practice what u preach. It seems that you're still unconvinced that pictures were not photo edit work.

There's nothing wrong in printing pictures of 046 movement, and I dare you to give the single incidence where they've shown these pictures as current movement. The current movement, in the news, actually turned out to be in larger scale than 046. Any evidence if you're able to provide may just be an unintentional error.

In my opinion, the newspapers like kantipur are fighting for their existence. They won't be able to survive in non-democratic environment, as Kantipur came into light only after democracy and will go into dark with the extinction of democracy in Nepal.

I'm not writing for kantipur as I don't have anything to do with them, but at least they've become the easiest n' best source of news. Regarding biases, I've heard alot about it in many forms in kantipur. However, we've to admit noone is perfect. I'm responding to this thread just because it seemed another propaganda to me.

.
I added around 300 people in this picture.
Find them where are they.

----------------------------------------------------------

This is a photoshop shit.
But the picture from Kantipur was a original one.
.

Whoever blamed it was photoshoped,

Why don't you come with way to prove it? "pixel density" "hologram"