“Monarchy is over in Nepal”. The same title is being used in fashionable ways by many media in this world—of course, only those who hold significant stake in Nepal. The biggest stake holder and the director of Nepal’s devastation is Nepal’s closest and sadistic neighbor, India. Even though the intellectuals are familiar with this direction, I would like to show why the world remains anonymous of this India’s sponsorship of terrorism in Nepal. Quite surprisingly, the actors have created a huge mass of junior actors in the hope to make them a lead actor one day. In the mean time, the director is enjoying the show. Let’s trace back when the director thought to direct this inhuman movie that might not leave the director an option of bankruptcy if the truth is exposed.

As known to the world, Nepal was a Kingdom and the most peaceful country in this chaotic earth. While many may disagree, however, there was no extreme poverty in Nepal in mid 20^th century. The Indo-Nepal friction started when the then Prime Minister of Nepal—Jung Bahaur Rana—supported the British India to suppress the Sepoy Rebellion. In 1857, India could have born, but since the Rana prime ministers of Nepal were strong allies of British, they supported British in their mission to crush any independence revolution. In fact, Nepal had already become an enemy of Indians then. Moreover, the strength of Gurkha army was the biggest obstacle for the Indians to overcome. Because of Rana’s support for British India, the later known India could not gain independence until 1947. Many of us forget to note, immediately after India was born, the Rana Empire was thrown out in Nepal in the year 1950. The then Prime Minster of Nepal—Mohan Shumsher Rana—was deposed who would later go to India on a self imposed exile. His titular successor—Pashupati Shumsher Rana—still resides in Nepal. His role would come into play post the Royal Massacre of 2001. Until 1950, Ranas were the prime rulers of Nepal and the monarchy was only symbolic. When India was born in 1947, the then prime minister of India was Jawarharlal Nehru—the same leader who kicked out Indira Nehru for marrying a Muslim, who would later become India Gandhi and the biggest enemy of Hindus and Sikhs.

There was another family who was fighting for the Indian state with the Indians—the Koiralas. Koiralas were Indians who were born in the Northern Province of British India –modern day of Bihar or Uttar Pradesh in India. Koiralas were three brothers who were born and raised in India. The family claims to be originally from Nepal, however, their roots and bushes have been found only in India. Even today, much of Koirala family resides in India—respecting the motherland. The Koirala brothers joined struggled to give birth to India. During the later years when India was about to born, Koiralas were suggested to form Nepal Congress Party within India. Finally India was born in 1947 with another new nation—Pakistan. Appropriate justice does not seem to be carried out looking at the area of India and Pakistan and the number of people residing. The most important factor was religion. Most of the princely states were to join the Union of India. One of the biggest Kingdoms was the Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir whose King Raja Hari Singh was a Hindu and the population majority was of Muslim. Raja Hari Singh decided not to surrender his Kingdom to either of the countries. However, illegally, India annexed the Kingdom into its Union. It is interesting to see how Indian text books claim this beautiful Kingdom a part of India. In the last days of 1948, a ceasefire was agreed under UN auspices demanding plebiscite. Nehru never proceeded with the UN resolution and hence, the ascertainity of the instrument of accession is questionable. The Kingdom—as falsely claimed by India and Pakistan—is still considered as the international disputed territory. Then India annexed the Kingdom of Gwalior, and the Kingdom of Hyderabad. By all means, they were illegal annexation. India’s vulture eyes were gazing the Kingdom of Sikkim and the Kingdom of Nepal. The Indian Congress had helped create Nepali congress for a good reason. The Indians had foreseen their fortune in Nepal. The Koiralas were assured by the Indians that they would help Nepal merge into India if the Indians help throw the Rana regime in Nepal. India was lured with this Childish Koirala Deal. Even a newborn child would see the benefit in helping the needy brothers. Finally, in 1950, King Tribhuwan fled to India to seek refuge from the Ranas. The only Royal member left was the 3 year old, the then prince Gyanendra. The Ranas—who were expert in analyzing the future—were familiar with the Indian game. The Indians had thought to end the monarchy in 1950, but the Ranas, moving a mile ahead, crowned the 3 year old as the King of the Kingdom of Nepal. The Koiralas’ and the Indians’ dream shattered. The Ranas knew that India wanted to weaken Nepal by overthrowing monarchy. Hence, they took the wisest step to save Nepal, and we witnessed the result. Even though the Ranas were able to save Nepal’s monarchy, unfortunately, their Empire was brought down. Since Ranas were the true Nationalists, their downfall encouraged India to envision a possibility to annexing Nepal into India.

Not that easy as the Indians had presumed. The King in Nepal was considered the reincarnation of Hindu God, and replacing the intuition of Monarchy was their far dream. They figured where the problem laid—Monarchy. Nevertheless, India did not stay quiet, and offered Sikkim and Nepal to sign the instrument of accession and join the Union of India Nepal’s the then King Mahendra got infuriated with the proposal, whereas the “Koirala equivalent” prime Minister of Sikkim offered Sikkim in the hands of India, only to be slaughtered. The three Koirala brothers became the prime ministers of Nepal on the recommendation and pressure from India. This paved an easy path for the Indians to observe Nepal more closely. Nepal’s monarchy was well aware of this Indian strategy, however, the then King Birendra had declared Nepal as the Zone of Peace in the 90s. This was endorsed by more than 110 countries of the world, except India. Intellectuals could smell the stink that was coming from the southern block. King Birendra’s popularity almost made India’s dream a nightmare. Moreover, the future King Dipendra was one of the most popular figures of Nepalese monarchy in the history.

India’s dream was almost impossible. As the Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi created LTTE in Sri Lanka, they thought to help launch a Maoist revolution in Nepal to break Nepal. The Maoists’ top demand was the abolition of Monarchy. Since the year 1996, India started funding Nepal Maoists to fight against state. As the Maoist party was formed in 1996, their leaders were backed up by the Indian government. Most of the Maoists leader lived in Darjeeling, Lucknow, and Delhi in India and masterminded their plan. These plans were executed by guerrilla who lived in Nepal and were dying to fight war. In other words, India created Communism in Nepal. They also were supported by the Indian Communist leaders and other Naxalite group who are fighting against the Indian government for communism. Surprisingly India never helped Nepal government in arresting those leaders and extraditing them in Nepal. When Nepali Maoists met Nepali Communist leaders in Lucknow, India in 2003, India government did not take initiative to arrest them, even though they were recognized as terrorists by the United States. Hence it is evident that India never wanted peace in Nepal. At the same time, international media was busy defaming the King Gyanendra.

The interesting chemistry was all political parties held discussions in India with the Maoists in the Indian’s presence. The irony was Maoists were able to kill Inspector General of Police of the Royal Nepalese Government, but were not able to kill any leaders. This does not digest well. These Maoists and leaders were in agreement not to kill each others leaders. Although India was successful in proving why they did not endorse “Zone of Peace”, they were unable to offer prayers to King. Then India played the worst game with the help of its own citizens—Koiralas, and Maoists to end the Nepalese monarchy—which the world today knows as the Nepal’s Royal Massacre.

After the Royal Massacre, many speculations were in the air. However, immediately after the incident, media, which are funded by India, started to air against Gyanendra, who was the only heir left to the throne. India’s, Koirala’s and Maoists’ strategy was to defame monarchy and most importantly, the monarch who was unknown to the world. India knew that King Birendra was most popular and if the blame could be dumped on Gyanendra, it would be the easiest way to uproot monarchy. And so was the story we witnessed. India had a sound plan to kill the Royal Family so that no one else would remain alive to keep the monarchy breathing. However, the massacre happened when King Gyanendra was out of town and allegedly was on the way back to the massacre site for the dinner. Gyanendra was crowned again as the King of Nepal, and India, once again, could not prove to be a successful director. India funded media were airing speculations about King Gyanendra. The love and respect for the King was then seen by the shaved head of all the Nepalese—who respected Nepalese Monarch as their father. Noticeably, the present Prime Minster, Girija Prasad, the same Indian Citizen, was the Prime Minister of Nepal during the Royal Massacre. He helped India facilitate the killings. Later, he also facilitated King Gyanendra, to be removed from the palace. In other words, the Koiralas were well aware of the killings, but instead of stopping India to kill the royals, the old traitor helped them successfully execute the plan.

The King wanted the then prime minister Sher Bahadur Deuba to hold the elections but even after he was granted to extend the date of election twice, he was never motivated to hold the election. The underlying political reason was that he continuously wanted to be in his office by postponing the election. As a Chief of State, King Gyanendra could not wait to see his country devastated. This made him to sack the cabinet and impose his direct rule. Subsequently, in October 2002, King Gyanendra dismissed the prime minister and his cabinet. While stopping short of reestablishing parliament, the king in June 2004 reinstated the most recently elected prime minister who formed a four-party coalition government. The King, citing dissatisfaction with the government, dissolved the government in 2005, declared a state of emergency, imprisoned party leaders, and assumed power. The king's government subsequently released party leaders and officially ended the state of emergency in May 2005, but the monarch retained absolute power until April 2006.

When King Gyanendra ascended throne in 2002, Nepal has been going through civil war from the past ten years. Politicians of Nepal, as an easy excuse to take benefit from inexperienced King imposed blame on him. When King sacked the parliament for its inability to hold elections, the law was enforced, the administration was healthy and the environment was getting conducive. He acted tough on the people to enforce laws. The 12 years of democracy by then had made Nepalese lazy and incompetent, but the king wanted to abolish the ongoing crisis. While most of Nepalese were pleased to see this progress, the corrupted people were unemployed. The leaders of Nepal are barely educated to find a job, if they do not engage themselves into politics. The government employees who never showed up on time were forced to be in the office and corruption was strictly made illegal. How can idle Nepalese like that? Obviously it will make them revolt. These led the politicians ally together and form a coalition to fight against the King. Nepal and Indian media supported well these coalition leaders. Countable 10-15 people gathered for to restore democracy and started protest. It was not until April 2006, when Maoists joined the movement to fight against king. Truckload Maoists entered the capital city to revolt. As a way to spread violence, Maoists attacked on Maoists in the revolution process and charged King for their deaths. After 30 people were killed, the King gave up all the powers and reinstated the government. Hence, the King who wanted to make the country progress was iconized as a dictator. Following that, if anyone in Nepal supports nationalism, then they are labeled as royalists or a dictator.

Now that the monarchy is gone, common Nepalese who are die hard fans of King, are looking for their God. However, Hinduism and Buddism have not taught violence to Nepalese. Maybe that’s why common Nepalese are not on the streets yet. I remain unanswered, is Hinduism’s patience tested? Is Gurkhas’ blood tested? Are the Nepalese tested? Nepal has so far witnessed the Maoists crowd, not the Nepali crowd, there will be a day when Gurkhalis will be on the streets to show the bravery of Amar Singh Thapa, Bir Balbhadra Kunwar, Bhimsen Thapa, or another Jung Bahadur Rana…and who knows, another Prithvi Narayan Shah to Unify the breaking Nepal.

http://newsblaze.com/story/20080619175135tsop.nb/topstory.html

it is well written, and some of the things do have strong points like how come there is not much of leaders being killed by maoist where as there has been more than 3000 people killed which included top police and army and innocent teachers from all around the country. there might be some, but compared to other profession there has not been that much. some of the other stuff like indian hand in royal massacre, i dont think this has any base and does not make any logic. bottom line this discussion does not have any ending except for speculation.

 

The following analysis and articles may shed light on the fact how International Intelligence has been targeting countries like Nepal.

1. Comparisons Between Recent U.S.-Backed Coups: Caracas and Kathmandu-by Wayne Madsen at http://www.monthlyreview.org/0902madsen.htm - HIGHLIGHTS: On June 1st, 2001, King Birendra, his wife and all his children, were assassinated. His younger brother, Gyanendra, was conveniently absent from the from the palace at the time of the massacre of all those who were ahead of him in succession to the throne. At first, Gyanendra and Prime Minister Girija Koirala announced that the worst royal massacre since the assassination of the Romanovs of Russia in 1917 had been caused by an automatic weapon that had gone off by itself. Soon, the explanation for the massacre was changed to a story befitting any Hollywood script. It was then announced that the King's oldest son, Crown Prince Dipendra, had murdered his entire family and then shot himself because his mother had forbidden him to marry a commoner. The new King Gyanendra's only son, Paras, an unpopular brute, was at the palace during the slaughter but managed to survive without so much as a scratch. Gyanendra himself has long been a CIA and U.S. corporate stooge. For example, he has a relationship with Henry Kissinger that goes back to the 1970s and the Ford administration. On the other hand, King Birendra wanted to open peace negotiations with the rebels and was also known to be a stauch anti-Indian Nepali nationalist..

2. The CIA's Death Squad Body Count Continues to Pile Up- Wayne Madsen - AT - http://cryptome.org/bush-kills.htm
   

   HIGHLIGHTS: Today, a former U.S. intelligence asset, Dr. Jonas Savimbi, was killed by Angolan Army units in eastern Angola. His is the sixth major assassination of a political leader since Bush unleashed his CIA death squads. If one includes the late Royal Family of Nepal and the late Congolese President Laurent Desire Kabila (assassinated just 4 days before Bush was sworn in as President), the number of those dispatched climbs even higher.
   

3. http://www.sangam.org/PIRABAKARAN/Part36.htm : According to the BBC, the state Police Intelligence Chief Kishore Jha, said the killing of Mr.Hrangkhawl was ‘a major success’. Indian intelligence is now pressing Bhutan and Bangladesh to arrest and extradite separatist refugees in those countries. The King of Bhutan and Prime Minister of Bangladesh might want to look at what happened to the entire Royal Family of Nepal last June when the late King decided to negotiate with leftist guerrillas rather than fight them. According to unblemished sources in Kathmandu, the king and his family were quickly dispatched by a Nepali army commando unit trained at the time by US Special Operation forces sent by US Pacific Commander in Chief Adm.Dennis Blair (he’s the same guy who propped up Gen.Wiranto with special training while the good general was committing genocide in East Timor). What was to become the Pentagon’s Office of Strategic Influence (PSYOPs division) prepared a story, with the assistance of India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) intelligence agency, that the King and his family were murdered as a result of the Crown Prince going nuts with automatic weapons after being forlorn over his mother’s refusal to allow him to marry a commoner. The entire Western media bought that story faster than George Bush nosediving after choking on a pretzel. The media also bought that one.”

4. http://www.sangam.org/PIRABAKARAN/Part36.htm : Some may still naively believe the story that Dipendra’s romance with Devyani Rana, a daughter from a noble family in India, sealed the fate of Nepal’s King Birendra and his immediate family as plausible. But, more convincing is the fact that there has been ‘bad blood’ between India and Nepal since Rajiv Gandhi’s prime ministerial period, due to the ‘plumbing activities’ perpetrated by the muscle-flexing intelligence operatives manned by the RAW agency. During the hearing of the M.C.Jain Commission, which investigated the Rajiv assassination trial, embarrassing evidence buttressing this fact was produced from an agent’s report of RAW’s station reporting an unverified source that the then Queen Aishwarya of Nepal had negotiated a ‘hit’ on Rajiv Gandhi through one Major General Aditya Shamser Jang Bahadur for 10 crore Indian rupees! [Source: India Today magazine, Dec.1, 1997]. I should not be misunderstood. I’m not advocating that Queen Aishwarya of Nepal was instrumental in Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination, and that her assassination was a ‘return hit’ instigated by the Indian operatives. Rather, it is my contention that Rajiv Gandhi assassination should not be viewed as an isolated killing of a member of a prominent Indian family, but as a single damaged spoke of South Asian wheel of political intrigue.

I second that rustymood............its all speculation. The death toll during the peoples war is around 16,000+ recorded.............thousands missing or unaccounted for. When it comes to what we all Nepalese actually want is PEACE AND PROSPERITY is it?????& what do all the leaders want ???answer;  POWER and MONEY.........................HOW??? create instability, roits, death & destruction, false hope and spread HATE and more UNSECURITY so any one who is ruling or leading will fail. ALL these leaders will keep on obstructing each other, fighting and Indian asskissing to come to power through death and destruction and spreading hatred amongst Nepalese people.........................FOR WHAT REASON or GOAL????????...................to bring PEACE AND PROSPERITY in Nepal...............LOL what an IRONY........

well summarized and concluded.

well written. as some made comment here this is ture, those who try to speak for the sake of nepal is know an royalist these days.

its shame, and i think we'll see the result after couple of years since we've seen the good sing of so called political parties after the 1st CA meeting.

 

.

this article has surely made my mind go into delima. i though that the politician and the moist were d heros of nepal but after going through d above article my whole opinioin has changed. king whom i though was d villan  has appeared as hero and d heros have turned to villans. being a born of india i always took india as my second mother land but its now very painful to find that indian politican are doing and had been doing nothing good for my mother land Nepal.

                   so i dont know what will hapen to our new nepal and to make d matter worse now nepal is in d hands of neplalis who are puppets in d hands of india politician...

 

                   GOD bless    NEPAL

Please check it too-http://hamrogaurab-nepal.blogspot.com/

Hello RiceOwls07, Who is behind not letting anybody investigate the royal massacre and imposing curfew while taking body of Dipendra to Aryaghat? What is the reason behind that from your perspective?

Does anything think the writer has written the truth?  Have heard lots of for/against.  How far is it true

Does anything think the writer has written the truth?  Have heard lots of for/against.  How far is it true

how can the writer blindly say that india and the koiralas were behind the killings?? does he have any f#cking proof? stupid ass article.

 

Why are Nepali after Indians?  India is the becoming the most powerful country in the world. Nepal is not nothing for us. After all these Gurkha come and live in India.  Many come just to find job and save their... if you don't like Indians, why don't you all Nepalese go out from India. We don't you all.

LOL GIVE ME A BREAK....INDIA THE MOST POWERFUL COUNTRY IN THE WORLD?????? DAMN YOU GUYS INDIANS HAVE THIS FALSE PRIDE THAT MAKES YOU THE MOST HATED PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD..........FUGGIN LOOK AT THE SLUMS IN YOUR COUNTRY.....FIRST TREAT YOUR POVERTY LEVEL AND THEN COMPARE...........if it wasnt that Nepali politics have been ruined by your RAW Nepal would have been far more rich and powerfull than India. anyways what pride do you talk about?? all those railroads, ports, airfields, famous land marks were built by the british goverment. you indians built the slums that surround the big indian cities like Mumbai, Calcutta etc. FIRST CLEAN YOUR INTERNAL PROBLEM AND POVERTY THAN START THE WORLD DOMINATION DREAMS LOL.................Hey I agree with you in one point...send all the nepalese home and tell all the fuggin DHOTIS TO LEAVE  NEPAL ALONE AND NEPALI POLITICS.....and in a few yrs .....Nepal will be one of the richest and powerful Asisn country......BECAUSE CHINA IS RIGHT THERE TO DO BUSINESS WITH US ......and India is INTRUDING OUR DEALS THROUGH THOSE RAW POLITICAL preassure on our good for nothing political leaders. BIHARI BABU DONT PLAY WITH NEPALI ANGER.........................IT WILL DESTROY YOU...JUST A WARNING

Maddog-there are no Indians in Nepal. Those are your own citizens and probably more Nepalis than your current political leaders.  Our citizen like Girja babu is ruling your Nepal.  He was born the same place this proud Bihari was born. Your ethnic problem is your problem within your border. India doesn't have to care about it. Your leaders are always leaned to India so that they can get benefit from India. After all they will come to India when their a_s is kicked. 

LOL BIHARIBABU...WAKEUP..........SON........TIMES ARE CHANGING AND AND YOUR INDIAN PRIDE...LMAO...........TELL ME WHY ARE INDIANS THE MOST HATED PEOPLE IN THE WORLD??? WHY??? AND YOU KNOW THAT BIHARI PEOPLE ARE EQUALLY DISCRIMINATED IN INDIA AS WELL.....LOL BHAIYAS THEY CALL THEM....FRUITSELLERS, PAAN DOKANS, ALL FREAKIN LOW STANDARDS ARE DONE BY BIHARI AND ALSO THE MOST CORRUPT AND CRIME RIDDEN PART OF INDIA..............WAKEUP BRO......BIHAR IS A SHAME OF INDIA.............DONT PLAY WITH FIRE IT WIL BURN YOU

Bihar is not shame. It is because of us Biharis India is advanced. The first president of India was from Bihar too. We Biharis did all sacrifices to make India whatever is today. Not those south indians who come here with fake certficiates. you Nepalis go and work for these garbages of India and what pride are you talking about

COME TO NEPAL AND SEE FOR YOUR SELF WHO COLLECTS ALL THE GARBAGE.....KHALI SHISI PURANO KAGAJ, CHANA CHATPAT, AE HUJUR SABJI AALO GOBI MATTAR, LOL ALL THOSE ARE BIHARIS SELLING STREET VENDORS AND WALKING FRUIT AND VEGETABLE SERVICE.......I THANK YOU FOR THE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE BIHARIS IN NEPAL. AS FOR YOUR CLAIM THAT BIHAR IS THE REASON FOR INDIAS DEVELOPEMENT........YOU ARE WRONG......IT WAS THE BRITISH INVASION AND YEARS OF BRITISH RAPING YOUR BUTT.......LOL........AS FOR US BRITISH COULD NEVER DEFEAT US IN BATTLE.........THEY KNEW INSTANTLY THAT WE ARENT TO MESS WITH.......SO THE SOONER INDIA REALIZE THAT THE BETTER.....................AND YES YOU STILL HAVENT TOLD ME WHY ARE INDIANS HATED ALL OVER THE WORLD?????

What is world for you? Where have you been in your life? You know a lot about India.  I think you have been to India and US (since most users from here) only.

I keep my friends close and my enemies even closer..................I know a lot about India........what do you know about Nepal????? The world means a lot for me because nepalese people are loved around the world for our nice humble character, where as you indians have this self given pride that it almost shouta out of every indian I meet that they are the best and know everything. STUPID AHOLES.....always bargaining for deals, cheap shoppers, never change, that horrifying accent, that smell of curry and insense stick when an indian passes by....YUKH....that tika on the forehead with a suit on what a terible sense of fashion. And always living the life style dictated by bollywood........THAT FAKE PRIDE YOU CARRY STINKS ALL AROUND THE WORLD.....i  have yet to meet anyone who likes indians....I know some indians who hates indians LOL. Yes i am in the states........and millions around the world are Nepalese who share this hate towards India.......INDIANS ARE SO FULL OF IT