Yes, Let's keep on rolling.

Anti_monarqi, your turn please.

oooohhhhoooo!!! Look at what nepe says. Read on.

-In any case, and in all fairness, Gyanendra might muster some genuinely political votes (including mine, really), if he declares Nepal a republic and go for a LEGITIMATE political life by taking part in elections. Wouldn't it be great ? Snap solution to the Maoist problem, snap solution to political parties' leadership problem and, most important of all, snap solution to the problem of the accommodation for King's irrepressible political ambition (to do good to people, granted) in one go ! -

Does this guy live in a real world????? YOu are a GENIUS!!!!!! OOOOHHHOOOO. Duh!!!!!!!!!! Snap snap snap snap! Presto! All the problem gone!!! It was so easy only nepe could think of this solution. Tukka ustad, bravo!

Anti-G,

Sajha has witnessed innumerable pathetic deaths of abusive rats inside unknown holes of anonymity. Not a single abusive rat has ever come out of the hole !

*** *** *** *** *** ***

PSC,

If the King agrees for a republic (hypothetically speaking), do you think the Maoists will still not agree to lay down their arms ?

I hope this is not what you meant when you said "Maoists will [not] easily laydown their weapons and join the mainstream". If you are, then our logic system is so different that there is no point for debating at all.

If not, if you agree that the Maoists are at least likely to lay down their arms if the King agrees for a republic, then shouldn't you, who believes that the Maoist is the problem No. 1 of Nepal, be pressuring the King instead of supporting his dictatorship ?

I agree with your implication that it is monumentally difficult to make the King to agree for a republic (giving his natural affinity for royal power). But isn't that all the more reason why we should pressure him more and more ?

Everybody (except the King) is ready for the republic. UML declared it yesterday. Anti-Koirala and pro-republican wave of common people and NC workers still continuing since Pokhara Kanda has shown beyond any doubt that, except for Shree 3 Girija Sumsher Koirala, Princess Sujata and a handful of his bhai-bhardars, NC is now a pro-republican party. UML's declaration will affect them (UML was actually waiting for NC to declare it's republican position first !) and it is not going to be too long before NC formally declares it's commitment to the republic Nepal.

King is the ONLY impediment to peace in Nepal and you guys are supporting him, at one hand, for pure love of peace and, yet, on the other hand, because you think that the King can not be removed easily ?

Finally, you are doubting that the Maoist might not lay down their arms for a democratic republic, and in the same breath, you are hoping that they will lay down their arms for the monarchy !

I don't know how you have convinced yourself, but this is simply incomprehensible.

*** *** ***

Earlier, in your conversation with Anilji regarding press freedom, you implied that the situation is not terrible at the moment. And I agree with you.

Compare today's situation with that during any freest time of Panchayat. Panchayat was dark as a hell. Compared to Panchayat what we have today is a Ramrajya.

But is it because Gyanendra is liberal ?

Nope. It is all because of the resilience of Nepali media with equally resilient popular support to them. That goes to all civil liberties.

Gyanendra has been doing everything (including using most laughable and totally false reasoning like Frequency Modulation is not compatible with the wave length of the voice of news !!!) to gag the media.

But my God, our media turned out so resilient, so creative minded, so united that they could overwhelm Gyanendra. All repressive measures of Gyanendra is in place and in action. But they just are not working.

As a matter of fact, and in all sincerity, I had not hoped that our media can be this resilient and this successful to overwhelm the regime. I still vividly remember how horribly silent was the media during the 'emergency' of Deuba period.

Perhaps there was a silent consent of the press to civil government. Perhaps media was still not mature then. Whatever the reason is the lack of resilience at that time was evident.

NY rally is among other thing for showing our support and solidarity to the resilience of Nepali media against the King's regime's all suppressive measures and tricks.

*** *** ***

PSC, at one point you asserted that private sector media are not balanced. OK, but how would private media compare with Gorkhaptra and NTV ? Care to share your opinion ?

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Nemesis,

Of course it is difficult. But difficult because of whom ?
Difficult because of political parties ? No.
Difficult because of the Maoists ? No.
Difficult because of the King ? Yes.

So whom should you be fighting with ? Nepe and Anil or the King ?

The confusion between the condition and the conclusion is the basis of all royalist arguments. Let me cite myself to illustrate what I mean,

almost all of the arguments against the republicanism in Nepal boils down to a confusion between "the Monarchy is necessary because it can not be removed" to "the Monarchy can not be removed because it is necessary"

cited from the opening line of Nepe's Bhagvat Geeta on Ganatatntra:
- http://www.sajha.com/sajha/html/openthread.cfm?forum=122&ThreadID=12335&show=all

Nepe,

Regarding your comment about anonymous posters, wake up NEPE, because if I am not mistaken more than 99% of the posters in sajha are anonymous. Anonymous people are discussing about things and answering each others questions here in sajha. Seems like you don't have the balls to answer questions directed at you, and you don't have the balls to continue discussions by answering valid questions.

Don't be pleading your way out citing anonymous posters reason. If you don't want to discuss with anonymous posters then you should not be posting or discussing in sajha. Or wait, do you only discuss with anonymous posters who agree with you? and who love you for quoting your own lines. Wah Nepe Wah!

Nepe....ENOUGH ASS TALK....YOU DUCK QUESTIONS AND ALLEGATIONS LIKE A TRUE POLITICIAN IN TRAINING. NEXT LESSON IS GOING TO BE..... GHUSS KASARI KHANEY ? HE HE

shyamu,

Only a FRACTION of anonymous posters are ABUSIVE. Those are what I am talking about. Don't pretend you could not understand.

wah!!! wah!!!!! wah !!!!!wah!!!!!! Mommi Mommi they keep baiting me. ha ha ha ha
Crybaby. NO WE ARE NOT GOING TO PLAY BY YOUR RULE....he he MR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC ha ha ha CRYBABY REPUBLIC is more like it he he he

Nepe,

Thanks for your comments even on behalf of Anil. I think Anil is busy making strategy for Sep 16 and preparing black flag and placards.

Let me ask you, what made you believe that the kind of republicanism that Maoist fighting for is the one you, anti-monarqi, Gagan and Narahari are demanding? If you keep on fulfilling Maoist demand then they will continue to leap frog to their ultimate goal until they achieve it. Your kind of republicanism may be foothold for them to move forward. Regarding UML, their ultimate goal is also no different then Maoist but they have in reality changed a lot over the period. My view is that it is not the democratic forces should bow down to Maoist?s terms and conditions, but efforts should be concentrated to make them agree on terms and conditions laid down by the democratic forces. That is why I am talking about ?all inclusive? settlement including monarchy for a longer term solution.

We also need a binding factor for our diverse ethnicity, geo-political situation, religious and cultural values and historical identity. Ordinary Nepalese are very simple people, not yet ready to accept forceful transformation. Nepal still needs a ?force? that can play a role of ?Referee? (as a check and balance system). There exist not only inter-party conflicts but also intra-party conflicts as well. Recent event of Pokhara is more than sufficient to justify this event. If you throw SATTA ko KURSI, our Party will do LUCHHA CHUDI, the same way that we saw people doing LUCHHA CHUDI OF KALO BOKA in a pond during one festival in Kathmandu. Hastily and shortsighted change and transformation will lead to know where. Tesaile apthyaro stithi ma ra vital national interest jogauna Neta harulai Danda hanne byakti chahinchha; testo bhumika hal ko abasthama Monarchyle matra nibhauna sakchha. We don?t want to be Sikkim or Bhutan. We don?t want our decision be made from New Delhi.

I agree that except during ?Emergency? Nepalese press is not facing any problem except to publish the news which directly support terrorist act or negative affect security forces operations. Do you believe that the freedom of speech and press that Nepal enjoying today really in accordance with basic norms and values, integrity, discipline, ethics and impartiality? It is for that reason I am saying that they are celebrating ?GAIJATRA? through out the year. ?Afno pakshya ma lekhe thik natra bhane bethik bhanne manasthiti ta chhadaichha?. Jhan byaparik ethical value bhanda pani hisable byapari harule chalayeko publications haru badhi bhayeko huda ta Raja, Neta ra Sena lai jati Gali Garyo teti badhi byapar hune manashtitile grasta media lai ke bhanne? Tesma pani sabai patrikaharu kunai na kunai rajnitik party ko mukh-patra ko rupma bhayeko huda tinma moral ethics ko asha garnu pani bekar chha. Sasto lokpriyata bhanda disciplined ra satya tathyama adharit media ajako abasyakta ho.

Regarding Frequency Modulation broadcasting, government during democratic era (JP Gupta was Minister that time) granted to open such program with the condition of broadcasting only entertainment and educational program but news items. The present government tried to follow that regulation, but this chapter is closed now when the SC gave the verdict in favour of them.

PSC,

On media,

I will leave it to more qualified people to reply to your advocacy for a state controlled media for Nepal. For me, that is simply out of question.


On necessity of the monarch as a binding power, guardian, umpire etc.

If you are talking about "active" monarch, the verifiable reality is that it can bind hardly 1% of the population. Several dozens bhai-bhardars, several thousands soldiers of RNA and a small percentage of population disillusioned with "democracy", that's all.

If you were talking about inactive monarch (pre-October 2002 type), there is no way to know in terms of %tage, simply due to lack of the test like Feb 1, however, the Maoist insurgency and it's continuation proved beyond any doubt that the all encompassing binding power of the inactive monarch was a false myth.

The binding of all Nepalis together throughout the modern history of Nepal, therefore, was most likely through the STATE, people's livelihood (ghar, khet-bari, jyaladari, jaagir) and the soil. Since these things are not going to change when the monarch becomes an ordinary citizen in republic Nepal, Nepal is not likely to disintegrate.

As for ethnical, religious, cultural and geographical integrity, political parties and all the aware citizens are talking about and are committed to inclusive and liberal democracy, devolution, secularism and all those failsafe tools of modern democracy. In modern times, that is what works to keep a nation-state intact and thriving.

You think future king Paras bir bikram Shahdev is what will keep Nepalis united instead (our kings are longevity-challenged, so we should expect Paras to be the king soon) ???????

An elected president of the republic Nepal will be a better guardian than King Paras of the kingdom of Nepal.

And supreme judiciary institutions like Supreme Court is the Umpire for everything disputed. You think King Paras will give better judgment than the Supreme Court can ?

So, PSCji, the problem with your otherwise very reasonable arguments is that when you talk about the monarchy, you talk like as if you are talking about an imaginary country with and imaginary King and people. And since it is an imaginary King, you have actually many different kings in your mind, each fulfilling different functions perfectly. That's what is leading you to totally self ?contradicting conclusion and what not.

Please keep the picture of King Paras in front of you when you talk about the future kingdom of Nepal. Only then your arguments and conclusions will correspond. I do hope you agree.

अहिलेलाई यत्ति मात्र सकें । Have a nice weekend !

Nepe

Hey Nepe and the likes,

Why don't you go to nepal and talk about these mental masturbations of yours. I am sick and tired of these assumptions and mental retardation. Make sure you write down objective proofs about each statement you make, or else from now your every stupid remark will be read as "Nepe is a gay f@#$er, c0ck sucker."

Nepe-

To weaken the king would be to strengthen the Maoists, whose victory could usher in a reign of even worse terror. Political parties have failed to control the Maoist problem. You just review the initiation of Maoist problem and asess the role of political parities and so called Nagarik Samaj (I mean only handful of them like Debendra raj, Mathura, Krishna Pahadi, etc). All they did was either instigating the Maoist or in many occasion directly or indirectly supporting them morally. Girija's shuttle from China to New Delhi just to make the Deuba Government's dialouge with Maoists failure is more than sufficient to justify it.

What I never understand is what led you to believe that Maoist will easily agree to term and condition laid down by the political parties? They are not that honest and Buddhu as you think from here. They very much know that by defeating Monarchy and RNA means achieving their ultimate goal. Maoist can easily take on political parties who are alreday in defeat mentality.

I am not advocating for active monarchy. Just because the Maoist does not want monarchy, we can not go blindly. Constututional monarchy is the need of the day. What I have not got answer so far is that what could have been the best alternate in October 2002 for King? You can not just jump in to conclusion by commenting post-2 Feb event. It has to be rather assessed and analyzed ever since the Maoist movement started, then you can get most of the answer easily. But to do such analysis you have to see from neutral perspective - you can not borrow a "Chasma" from Gagan, Narahari, Baburam or anyother clowns to see the sequence of events.

Monarchy is an institution, and in constitutional monarchy, King barely have any power. All the power is vested with parliament and executive power remain with the PM and hsi cabinet. Preserving monarchy is also the continuation of our golden history. Why should we try to copy or change something which was never tested, never experienced and which will have tremendous risks to have many adverse effects (cultural, religious, geo-political, ethinic and what not) with no solid advantages. Do you want to keep on experimenting for another decades?

Enjoy your weekend.

PSCji,

Here is reply.

>To weaken the king would be to strengthen the Maoists

Quite the contrary, PSCji.

No monarchy = No good reason for the Maoists to rebel.
Political parties + King = Maoists are freedom fighters

So, to strengthen the monarchy [by political parties] is to strengthen the Maoists' raison d'etre [of democracy] and, hence, to strengthen them morally.

> Political parties have failed to control the Maoist problem.

Totally absurd.

First, at the military front, it is the RNA that has failed, not the Political parties.

Second, at the political front, The government (Political parties) never had a free hand to negotiate with the Maoists.

The government's hands were chained to [the obligation of saving ] the monarchy [at any cost].

So, what actually political parties failed in is - to make a point to save the monarchy. That's what they failed in.

You want to them to try again what they have already tried THREE times (peace talks) and failed. That too when they've got a new and stronger reason to get rid of the monarchy instead of saving it at any cost.

It can't be more absurd.

>so called Nagarik Samaj (I mean only handful of them like Debendra raj,
>Mathura, Krishna Pahadi, etc). All they did was either instigating the
>Maoist or in many occasion directly or indirectly supporting them morally.

I wouldn't call it instigating and supporting. But you are right that the civic society has been soft on the Maoists.

The why is obvious.

Because while the Maoists have a WRONG ideology and method, their PURPOSE of getting rid of the monarchy is RIGHT.

So, getting rid of monarchy is, as I said above, making the Maoists PURPOSELESS or an outfit with COMPLETELY wrong purposes [of establishing a communist republic]. When it happens, the civic society naturally will be hard on the Maoists [in case they refused to be part of the democratic republic].

Until then, and particularly when one is talking about strengthening the monarchy, you can not expect the civic society to be hard on the Maoists.
It's simple as that.

>what led you to believe that Maoist will easily agree to term and
>condition laid down by the political parties?

As I have repeated many times, there is no guarantee about the Maoists. So we need to talk in terms of LIKELIHOOD.

The likelihood of the Maoists to agree to disarm for the republic is way way way way way more than the likelihood of the Maoists to agree to disarm for the constitutional monarchy.

Let's put it this way, (exact numbers not important)

The chances that the Maoists will agree to disarm for republic = 99%
The chances that the Maoists will agree to disarm for C. Monarchy = 1%

In this whole thread, your arguments (repeated on and on) is trying to convince that the chance (1%) of disarming the Maoists for C. Monarchy is greater than the chance (1%) that the Maoists will not disarm for the republic democracy. You are almost right, because 1% is almost greater than 1%. However, you are almost absolutely wrong because you are ignoring 99% chance described above.

> what could have been the best alternate in October 2002 for King?

Not only in October, but just about any day since 1996 (or whenever the Maoists were felt a power that can not be ignored) to this very day, the best thing for the King (yes, Birendra included) to do was letting the PEOPLE to decide what they say about the monarchy. It could be a referendum. It could be a Constitutional Assembly.

Look what is the King doing ? Is it surprising that he is getting support from none of political parties', civic society and the international community ?

> Preserving monarchy is also the continuation of our golden history.

If Narayahity has a lot of gold, may be then a golden history. Otherwise what golden history ? Before 2007 saal, several generation of kings were nobody. After 2007 saal, Tribhuvan betrayed his initial commitment for sovereignty to the people and gradually acquired more and more power. Mahendra needless to talk about. Birendra followed his father's footsteps until Nepali people revolted. Gyanendra, we are seeing. Paras, we can guess.

Is it a golden history or iron history ?

OK, let's not answer this question. Let the people of Nepal answer this question in a Referendum or a CA. Fair enough ?

> Why should we try to copy or change something which was never tested,
> never experienced . . . Do you want to keep on experimenting for another
>decades?

Democratic republic is the ultimate democracy. So, it's not experimenting, but reaching there finally.

On the contrary to what you say, restoring Constitutional monarchy will be experimenting and experimenting and experimenting the same thing that has failed and failed and failed.

No more experiments with compromised democracy. That's the growing voice of Nepali people today.

No more experiments. Straight to democracy.

Nepe

Nepe,

1. Monarchy will never give up throne without a bloodbath.

2. Maoists if they compromise with poltical parties and fight to bring republic. There will be communism.

SO WHERE IS THE DEMOCRATIC FORCE WHO IS GONNA DEFEAT BOTH COMMUNISTS AND MONARCHY??

WHAT ABOUT THE COLAPSE OF MONARCHY AND RISE OF MAOISM??

Nepe please use your common sense for a while.

Nepe,

I agree with you about democracy. I aslo want democracy. But first of all I think peace and stability are the most important element. SO I am saying we need a common ground.

All the three forces should be included. R Maoists willing to give up communism dreams?? Thats the worst thing that could happen to nation?

How to remove corrupt and inept leaders?

SO I think we need step by step move to total democracy and to fulfill the will of the people.

Some more factors.

1. Creation of vigilian group. This is a scary development supported by governtment. Now there are small groups with weapons. There might be possibilty of armed resistance and possiblity of acts of terrorism.

2. Maoists in the power, big time human rights violation, possible genocide and how they deal with the international community is a big question. That will be total failure.

3. Democratic republic??? But how??

Nepe -

Deduction of your arguments are as following:
1) Monarchy and political parties have to surrender to Maoists and agree on all demand that they have made.
2) Maoists terrorism from 1996 to 2002 was mainly directed towards monarchy only, nothing to do with any thing else.
3) Maoist problem from 19996 is solely military problem hence it is failure of RNA not being able to control this problem (though mobilized only after 2002). It is not a political problem, therefore, there is no question of political failure.
4) There is no positive role of Shaha dynasty in Nepalese history.
5) Once the referendum or election for constitution assembly is held, all the problem of Nepal will be automatically die-down. Maoists will lay down their weapons and join mainstream politics.
6) Nagrik Samaj is having soft approach towards Maoists (support terrorism).
7) Democratic republic will be only solution to bring stability in Nepal and it is not an experiment (despite of grave differences within the major political parties). Maoist will also easily accept it.

Nepe - let me tell you frankly, either you are out from Nepal for long time and you are too much influenced by media propaganda, or you have been so much indoctrinated to western world that you have forget our ground reality.

It is not that easy as you have perceived. Your one sided assessment and suurendering attitude (towards Maoists) will lead to more problem than any solution. You can not discard monarchy at this stage which enjoys support of many royalists and also support from majority of neutral people (who are not directly aligned with any political parties). As I wrote in my previous thread, monarchy is not King Gyanendra or in future Paras, it is an institution which has become part of Nepalese history, culture, social and religious integrity and symbol of national unity.

I know you will not agree, but this is the fact and reality. "Highfly" is talking very sensibly, he seems to be familiar of Nepalese reality. Monarchy in Nepal can not be a foe where as Maoists will never become firendly to democracy. Maoists might use your way of republicanism as a foothold to gain their way of republicansim. Bottomline - your way of republicansim will pave the way for Maoist to achieve victory for their cause. As long as RNA and monarchy together with democratic forces are united, Nepal will never have to experience the communism. Otherwise we will have new kind of experiment - communist totalitarian regime. I would be comfortable to live under constitutional monarchy than to live under communist regime. You are lucky, you don't have to live in Nepal hence do not have to experience any kind of regime. There is a very popular way of saying in (Russian way) Nepal sproski bigroski bhatoksoki timilai ke matlab?

:-)

Friends,

Since my post elsewhere on this forum on a similar topic went unheeded, I am repeating the same point here.

In my view, nothing substantial can be gained, other than a coverage in the media, from the protests and black flag waving events. Every Prime Minister, minister or a leader from Nepal, who is solely or in part responsible for creating and perpetuating a mess we are in now, visited the US in the last decade and was accorded a warm and flattering reception. No blag flag or words of protests were uttered. From the pictures we have seen on the website, even Marichman Singh, under whose Prime Ministership during the Panchayat regime many democracy movement activists were gunned down cruelly, had quite a few admirers, or shall I say beneficieries, in the nation?s capital.

When the king visits New York in September, I am would rather see him come to the community and have an interaction, provided he is willing. By community I do not mean a group of those willing chamchas or resurrected panchas and their off springs, and sycophants who would perform any act and continue to deceive the Nepali people at home and abroad. We espouse having a dialogue with the Maoists to find a peaceful solution to the prroblem, and why not with the king too? We see the pictures of the king talking to an old lady and other people during his recent tours of east and west Nepal, why not the king have a town hall type meeting with the Nepali communities living in the US. The controlled press in Nepal can have many pictures of the king interacting with the Nepali diaspora.

I would particularly like the king to address the following in this interaction:

1. Give us a set of milestones with timeline and a clear road map to restore democracy within his proclaimed three-year direct rule.

The king's six-month rule so far does not give much confidence. It is time that we knew clearly what his plans are to bring the democracy back. And, what kind of democracy does he plan to bring back? Hopefully, not the kind ridden with bad goverance and corruption much of the time during the Koirala and Deuba rule and certainly not the "soil suited" type.

Other questions:

a. Will you sit with the political parties and the Maoists to bring peace to the king? If yes, what are your conditions, if any, or plans to bring them to the negotiation table? What are your expectations from the political leaders and parties to restore peace and democracy?

b. Will you take actions, not just to a selective few, but to also those, including the ones in the Palace and those hover around the palace, who have been involved in corruption in the last several years? What are his plans to weed out corruption?

c. What is your vision for Nepal and Nepalis?

I would think that the king would be willing to take the opportunity to come and speak to the Nepali communities in as many cities in the US as he could during his September visit.

(By the way, it will also be a good opportunity for many of us to see how the turn coats and sycophants move their bodies to serve the king, a rare opportunity to observe first hand the chaplusi and chakari).

Good old Nepe? so much entertainment at no cost : )

For a delusional sociopath like yourself, your existence on a website is the pinnacle of self-empowerment. You cannot actually practice anything you preach, the best you can do is instigate ? a true politician in hiding. If you were serious about your preaching, you?d be living on the Indo-Nepal border, not in the US.

You thrive off the subsistence that cyberspace gives you and I am thriving off watching your tone change with each progressive posting. You?re not the cocky little shit you once were and this gives me immense pleasure.

As I?d outlined before, you are an individual filled with hate-driven logic that often blinds you from a reality other than which you believe as the ONLY and ABSOLUTE truth. You are not a true advocate of a democratic republic, you?re just another number in the crowd, clamoring for a shot at power politics on your own terms. As I?ve said before this is about fame and power for YOU, not for anyone else, just for YOU.

At the very heart of all this bull shit that Nepe is producing is this:

Political Parties + King = Maoists are freedom fighters + (Nepe is a fraud on sajha.com)

Conversely,

No Monarchy = No good reason for Maoists to rebel + (High probability that Maoists will disarm) + (Nepal will live happily ever after) + (Nepe as political advisor to the Maoist Politburo)

In reality,

No Monarchy = Half the battle for the Politicians + The whole battle for the Maoists + No probability of democratic republic + Nepe continues to live in the US and write his bull shit on sajha.


Nepe does not assume (let alone speak) for a true republican democrat agenda. He is one of many propaganda mouthpieces in an elaborate web of self-deluded individuals, filled with hate-driven, individualist political motives (this of course, Nepe tactically denies on occasion, don?t you Nepe? : -))

So, while the thought that I may soon disappear from this site (and stop giving you cause for grief) may be temporary respite, despair not, I am here for good. : )

Answer my 6 questions Nepe, simple yes/no answers. Why have you hesitated so much to answer them? ; )

You are the personification of the pro-Maoist, pro-totalitarian, hate-filled, deception-laden individual. Nothing more Nepe. And I am here to continually expose you for the REAL WORK OF FRAUD that you are.

HAhahahahah!!!!

Good laugh Bihan. You can take the opportunity to ask Gyanendra whatever you'd like. But let me take this opportunity to ask you just one question... how utterly devoid of common-sense do you think we are?

I don't know about any other sycophants but one seems guaranteed... an imposter with the name "Bihan" written all over it, sucking up to the King and his entourage.

Friend, you're insulting your own intelligence. Please do something about this and save yourself.

Anti_G

Miss Anti_G,
सुश्रीजी कुरा के भने नि तपाईँ नेपेको तर्कसित असहमत हुनुन्छ, ठिकै होला/नहोला, त्यो त कुनै नौलो कुरा भएन।
तर तपाईँका बिचारहरु चैँ के नि? खोई कति दिन भो कुनै धागोमा पनि मैले प्रस्ट पाउन सकिन त। यस्तो पनि कुनै तरिका हो? मान्छेको ट्याम मात्रै खाइदिनी भन्या?