“Monarchy is over in Nepal”. The same title is being used in fashionable ways by many media in this world—of course, only those who hold significant stake in Nepal. The biggest stake holder and the director of Nepal’s devastation is Nepal’s closest and sadistic neighbor, India. Even though the intellectuals are familiar with this direction, I would like to show why the world remains anonymous of this India’s sponsorship of terrorism in Nepal. Quite surprisingly, the actors have created a huge mass of junior actors in the hope to make them a lead actor one day. In the mean time, the director is enjoying the show. Let’s trace back when the director thought to direct this inhuman movie that might not leave the director an option of bankruptcy if the truth is exposed.

As known to the world, Nepal was a Kingdom and the most peaceful country in this chaotic earth. While many may disagree, however, there was no extreme poverty in Nepal in mid 20^th century. The Indo-Nepal friction started when the then Prime Minister of Nepal—Jung Bahaur Rana—supported the British India to suppress the Sepoy Rebellion. In 1857, India could have born, but since the Rana prime ministers of Nepal were strong allies of British, they supported British in their mission to crush any independence revolution. In fact, Nepal had already become an enemy of Indians then. Moreover, the strength of Gurkha army was the biggest obstacle for the Indians to overcome. Because of Rana’s support for British India, the later known India could not gain independence until 1947. Many of us forget to note, immediately after India was born, the Rana Empire was thrown out in Nepal in the year 1950. The then Prime Minster of Nepal—Mohan Shumsher Rana—was deposed who would later go to India on a self imposed exile. His titular successor—Pashupati Shumsher Rana—still resides in Nepal. His role would come into play post the Royal Massacre of 2001. Until 1950, Ranas were the prime rulers of Nepal and the monarchy was only symbolic. When India was born in 1947, the then prime minister of India was Jawarharlal Nehru—the same leader who kicked out Indira Nehru for marrying a Muslim, who would later become India Gandhi and the biggest enemy of Hindus and Sikhs.

There was another family who was fighting for the Indian state with the Indians—the Koiralas. Koiralas were Indians who were born in the Northern Province of British India –modern day of Bihar or Uttar Pradesh in India. Koiralas were three brothers who were born and raised in India. The family claims to be originally from Nepal, however, their roots and bushes have been found only in India. Even today, much of Koirala family resides in India—respecting the motherland. The Koirala brothers joined struggled to give birth to India. During the later years when India was about to born, Koiralas were suggested to form Nepal Congress Party within India. Finally India was born in 1947 with another new nation—Pakistan. Appropriate justice does not seem to be carried out looking at the area of India and Pakistan and the number of people residing. The most important factor was religion. Most of the princely states were to join the Union of India. One of the biggest Kingdoms was the Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir whose King Raja Hari Singh was a Hindu and the population majority was of Muslim. Raja Hari Singh decided not to surrender his Kingdom to either of the countries. However, illegally, India annexed the Kingdom into its Union. It is interesting to see how Indian text books claim this beautiful Kingdom a part of India. In the last days of 1948, a ceasefire was agreed under UN auspices demanding plebiscite. Nehru never proceeded with the UN resolution and hence, the ascertainity of the instrument of accession is questionable. The Kingdom—as falsely claimed by India and Pakistan—is still considered as the international disputed territory. Then India annexed the Kingdom of Gwalior, and the Kingdom of Hyderabad. By all means, they were illegal annexation. India’s vulture eyes were gazing the Kingdom of Sikkim and the Kingdom of Nepal. The Indian Congress had helped create Nepali congress for a good reason. The Indians had foreseen their fortune in Nepal. The Koiralas were assured by the Indians that they would help Nepal merge into India if the Indians help throw the Rana regime in Nepal. India was lured with this Childish Koirala Deal. Even a newborn child would see the benefit in helping the needy brothers. Finally, in 1950, King Tribhuwan fled to India to seek refuge from the Ranas. The only Royal member left was the 3 year old, the then prince Gyanendra. The Ranas—who were expert in analyzing the future—were familiar with the Indian game. The Indians had thought to end the monarchy in 1950, but the Ranas, moving a mile ahead, crowned the 3 year old as the King of the Kingdom of Nepal. The Koiralas’ and the Indians’ dream shattered. The Ranas knew that India wanted to weaken Nepal by overthrowing monarchy. Hence, they took the wisest step to save Nepal, and we witnessed the result. Even though the Ranas were able to save Nepal’s monarchy, unfortunately, their Empire was brought down. Since Ranas were the true Nationalists, their downfall encouraged India to envision a possibility to annexing Nepal into India.

Not that easy as the Indians had presumed. The King in Nepal was considered the reincarnation of Hindu God, and replacing the intuition of Monarchy was their far dream. They figured where the problem laid—Monarchy. Nevertheless, India did not stay quiet, and offered Sikkim and Nepal to sign the instrument of accession and join the Union of India Nepal’s the then King Mahendra got infuriated with the proposal, whereas the “Koirala equivalent” prime Minister of Sikkim offered Sikkim in the hands of India, only to be slaughtered. The three Koirala brothers became the prime ministers of Nepal on the recommendation and pressure from India. This paved an easy path for the Indians to observe Nepal more closely. Nepal’s monarchy was well aware of this Indian strategy, however, the then King Birendra had declared Nepal as the Zone of Peace in the 90s. This was endorsed by more than 110 countries of the world, except India. Intellectuals could smell the stink that was coming from the southern block. King Birendra’s popularity almost made India’s dream a nightmare. Moreover, the future King Dipendra was one of the most popular figures of Nepalese monarchy in the history.

India’s dream was almost impossible. As the Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi created LTTE in Sri Lanka, they thought to help launch a Maoist revolution in Nepal to break Nepal. The Maoists’ top demand was the abolition of Monarchy. Since the year 1996, India started funding Nepal Maoists to fight against state. As the Maoist party was formed in 1996, their leaders were backed up by the Indian government. Most of the Maoists leader lived in Darjeeling, Lucknow, and Delhi in India and masterminded their plan. These plans were executed by guerrilla who lived in Nepal and were dying to fight war. In other words, India created Communism in Nepal. They also were supported by the Indian Communist leaders and other Naxalite group who are fighting against the Indian government for communism. Surprisingly India never helped Nepal government in arresting those leaders and extraditing them in Nepal. When Nepali Maoists met Nepali Communist leaders in Lucknow, India in 2003, India government did not take initiative to arrest them, even though they were recognized as terrorists by the United States. Hence it is evident that India never wanted peace in Nepal. At the same time, international media was busy defaming the King Gyanendra.

The interesting chemistry was all political parties held discussions in India with the Maoists in the Indian’s presence. The irony was Maoists were able to kill Inspector General of Police of the Royal Nepalese Government, but were not able to kill any leaders. This does not digest well. These Maoists and leaders were in agreement not to kill each others leaders. Although India was successful in proving why they did not endorse “Zone of Peace”, they were unable to offer prayers to King. Then India played the worst game with the help of its own citizens—Koiralas, and Maoists to end the Nepalese monarchy—which the world today knows as the Nepal’s Royal Massacre.

After the Royal Massacre, many speculations were in the air. However, immediately after the incident, media, which are funded by India, started to air against Gyanendra, who was the only heir left to the throne. India’s, Koirala’s and Maoists’ strategy was to defame monarchy and most importantly, the monarch who was unknown to the world. India knew that King Birendra was most popular and if the blame could be dumped on Gyanendra, it would be the easiest way to uproot monarchy. And so was the story we witnessed. India had a sound plan to kill the Royal Family so that no one else would remain alive to keep the monarchy breathing. However, the massacre happened when King Gyanendra was out of town and allegedly was on the way back to the massacre site for the dinner. Gyanendra was crowned again as the King of Nepal, and India, once again, could not prove to be a successful director. India funded media were airing speculations about King Gyanendra. The love and respect for the King was then seen by the shaved head of all the Nepalese—who respected Nepalese Monarch as their father. Noticeably, the present Prime Minster, Girija Prasad, the same Indian Citizen, was the Prime Minister of Nepal during the Royal Massacre. He helped India facilitate the killings. Later, he also facilitated King Gyanendra, to be removed from the palace. In other words, the Koiralas were well aware of the killings, but instead of stopping India to kill the royals, the old traitor helped them successfully execute the plan.

The King wanted the then prime minister Sher Bahadur Deuba to hold the elections but even after he was granted to extend the date of election twice, he was never motivated to hold the election. The underlying political reason was that he continuously wanted to be in his office by postponing the election. As a Chief of State, King Gyanendra could not wait to see his country devastated. This made him to sack the cabinet and impose his direct rule. Subsequently, in October 2002, King Gyanendra dismissed the prime minister and his cabinet. While stopping short of reestablishing parliament, the king in June 2004 reinstated the most recently elected prime minister who formed a four-party coalition government. The King, citing dissatisfaction with the government, dissolved the government in 2005, declared a state of emergency, imprisoned party leaders, and assumed power. The king's government subsequently released party leaders and officially ended the state of emergency in May 2005, but the monarch retained absolute power until April 2006.

When King Gyanendra ascended throne in 2002, Nepal has been going through civil war from the past ten years. Politicians of Nepal, as an easy excuse to take benefit from inexperienced King imposed blame on him. When King sacked the parliament for its inability to hold elections, the law was enforced, the administration was healthy and the environment was getting conducive. He acted tough on the people to enforce laws. The 12 years of democracy by then had made Nepalese lazy and incompetent, but the king wanted to abolish the ongoing crisis. While most of Nepalese were pleased to see this progress, the corrupted people were unemployed. The leaders of Nepal are barely educated to find a job, if they do not engage themselves into politics. The government employees who never showed up on time were forced to be in the office and corruption was strictly made illegal. How can idle Nepalese like that? Obviously it will make them revolt. These led the politicians ally together and form a coalition to fight against the King. Nepal and Indian media supported well these coalition leaders. Countable 10-15 people gathered for to restore democracy and started protest. It was not until April 2006, when Maoists joined the movement to fight against king. Truckload Maoists entered the capital city to revolt. As a way to spread violence, Maoists attacked on Maoists in the revolution process and charged King for their deaths. After 30 people were killed, the King gave up all the powers and reinstated the government. Hence, the King who wanted to make the country progress was iconized as a dictator. Following that, if anyone in Nepal supports nationalism, then they are labeled as royalists or a dictator.

Now that the monarchy is gone, common Nepalese who are die hard fans of King, are looking for their God. However, Hinduism and Buddism have not taught violence to Nepalese. Maybe that’s why common Nepalese are not on the streets yet. I remain unanswered, is Hinduism’s patience tested? Is Gurkhas’ blood tested? Are the Nepalese tested? Nepal has so far witnessed the Maoists crowd, not the Nepali crowd, there will be a day when Gurkhalis will be on the streets to show the bravery of Amar Singh Thapa, Bir Balbhadra Kunwar, Bhimsen Thapa, or another Jung Bahadur Rana…and who knows, another Prithvi Narayan Shah to Unify the breaking Nepal.

http://newsblaze.com/story/20080619175135tsop.nb/topstory.html

What is this again? Nepalis don't have anything else to do? Just writing bad about Indians?

Commentary / Editorial



Much is in the news that Nepal’s first ever Vice-President took oath of secrecy for his post in Hindi language. Unknown to this controversy, Mr. Jha knowingly sparked this communal outrage despite knowing that “Hindi” is not a language for “any” ethnic Nepalese. The criticism was certain.

Madhesis—people living in the Southern part of Nepal—share common culture with some people of the northern province of India. Nationalist Madeshis have serious objection to the word “Indian Origin” associated with them. In fact, there was no such thing as “India” when Madeshis used to live in Nepal. Madheshi a race in Nepal, and portraying them as people of “Indian Origin” is putting their identity in crisis. Madeshis always existed in Nepal; history does not support anywhere that Madeshis migrated from British India. Labeling Madeshis as Indians is India’s mere strategy to gain control over greater Nepal.

Because of the cultural similarity, Madeshis preferred to be closely associated with India. However, they were not able to see the visionary approach of Indian expansionism over Nepal. The fact that Madeshis were ignored in Nepal was because of the lack of Madeshis to be a “Nepali”. Their upbringing was more “Indian” rather than a “Nepali”. Most Madhesis get married in India, and send their children to India for higher studies. I remember while having conversation with a fellow Madheshi, they used to say, “If a problem arises in Nepal, we will cross border to India”. This implies that they never truly believed that Nepal belongs to them equally as the people of Pahadi origin. Madeshis’ upbringing has major deficiencies for not letting them to be Nepali. They are hesitant to speak in Nepali, wear like Nepalese, or identify themselves as Nepalese; yet, they claim they have been denied of fundamental rights.

There have been issues of racism; this fact cannot be ignored. However, the astute nature shown by Madeshis to break Nepal into their regional interest in unacceptable by any ‘Nationalist Nepali”. The proud of being a Nepali can only be understood if you learn to be proud of what you have. We are lacking the visionary approach here to understand the matter of complex foreign affairs involved. The people’s war started against the atrocity of the government to change the system—not to introduce a regional war. After the Maoists agreed to end the bloody war, the self interested parties showed their opportunism. They realized that was the time to bargain. After three years of bargaining, Nepal is getting smaller everyday, people are turning against their own fellow Nepalese, and India’s dream to break Nepal is succeeding. We Nepalese have acted foolishly in this matter. Despite knowing the “cruel” nature of India, Nepalese are fighting within themselves.

A joint approach from all Madeshis, Pahadis and other ethnicities, can uplift Nepal to the level where Nepal deserves to be. Nepalese have not mastered to be the “fraud” as their Indian counterparts are—which gives a clean image of Nepalese to this entire world. It is the time to understand what lacks within us that is hindering us from progressing. Why Nepalese cannot stand strong to resist India and be prepared to launch a war against India if a need arises?

The history of Gurkhas evidences the bravery because of which no umpire on earth could rule this land of Gurkhas. The federal system of division based on ethnicity will further invite a clash of two different ethnicities. If people of Nepal truly want a federal state, why are they not pushing the agenda of “Greater Nepal” to reverse the Sugauli Treaty? After all, India has illegally captured our land. Why can’t Nepal expand its border towards the South while India continuously attacks Nepal’s border? Madeshis’ presumption that India cares about them is erroneous. Ethnicity has been used as a tool to gain political recognition by leaders. We should take precaution here. Let the Nepalese not be derailed from the path of “Nationalism” and divert you towards “ethnocentrism” by these leaders.

We must realize, our Nepal, is in great danger and needs to be rescued. It was unfortunate for Nepal the day British Umpire left India. Since the day India was born, Nepal has been on the edges of annexation by this unfriendly neighbor. India presumes that the entire people of the world who resemble South Asians are Indians. In the foreign land, if they see any South Asian, they question “What part of India are you from?” People remain shocked about this inference. Without any reasonable justification, they falsely presume everyone to be Indian. It is their lack of knowledge that makes their brain revolves only around India, but they seek opportunities only in the outer part of “their world”. This shows their nature of upbringing.

Hence, the oath taking of Nepalese Vice President in Hindi language strengthens India’s views that Nepal is India. Nepalese should not afford India an opportunity for this false presumption. His using of Hindi language has not only humiliated the Madheshis, but the Nepalese throughout the world. He has attempted to unofficially recognize Nepal as part of India. This act must be deplored, and it needs a worldwide protest. No act of comprise with Nepal’s sovereignty should be tolerated. Nepalese must be united to fight for their recognition, and if need be, this leader should be arrested in charge of violating the Nepal’s constitution and the spirit of the people. So far, the Justice system in Nepal has failed due to the inability of the justices to grab power and ensure a fair checks and balance. This serves as an opportunity for the Supreme Court of Nepal to show that judicial system stands by the truth and cares for the nation equally as the citizens of Nepal.

The lack of patriotism could be blamed for this act. Ethnicity and Nationality has no correlation. At this hour, Nepal’s sovereignty is threatened; yet, we are looking for self interest. This is the time to be united and flourish the glory of our motherland to the entire world. Together, we can do it. The bravery and intellect garnered by our forefathers will prove to be true eventually and we can unify Nepal again as the founding father Prithvi Narayan Shah did.
http://www.bangladesh-web.com/view.php?hidRecord=213541

seriousnepali, i thought this was a public forum.  I am here because I find it interesting.  I did not know Nepalese hate India this much. It is good to get a clear message though. I think we Biharis and UPs need to demand a separate nation as well.  Indians and Nepalese all have misused us. Imagine, what would you have done if you were born in Bihar? You can accept a Bihari person but not a person from Bihar.  You all contradict in some form.  First you must know what you like and hate.  What is the reason you hate us?  If you hate us, we will hate you.  This game will be going on. So kick the a$$ of this writer who is against India.  I also ask the admin to delete this posting.

look at ur attitude MF bihari.  we hate because of ur attitude. don't ever think that u guys r smart. u guys r now growing coz u're slaved by british and develop the foundation for u.

if u change ur attitude, everybody will love u. don't ever think that if u put ur neighbour in fire, u r gonna stay safe. it might take sometimes but its gonna destroy u.

and one more thing, all of our MF leaders who were in india and somehow have some sort of attachment with india will die soon. some of them due to age and some of them will by new nepalese progressive force. after that we will b fine. once we eliminate some leaders then there won't b any problem

we'll see MF. we will see

Ek@l sorry for delayed response. I was holding meeting with your leaders lol. at least your leaders are with our leaders are.

This is the time to evaluate what we have done.  Witnessing the heinous present condition of Nepal, we may want to revert back Nepal's decision to be a republic.  The good old days were much better.  Nepal Army is the only institution that we can depend on now to save Nepal.  The parties are on the verge to disappear Nepal from world map.  We hope this never happens.

I agree wid u...those so called biharis said nepalis are losers??? Well if they really want the proof of losers then they can come to our country's footpath and see their people begging money, selling pani puri and banana with their dirty unwashed hands, and carrying tokari on their head to earn 50 cents...hahaa Moreover, they sleep on roads and don't have any other thing to wear other than faateko dhoti...hahaahaa

Nepal is the best...THey are cheaters, thieves who steal our history and tag their name on it

How dare you bihari?..HOW DARE YOU..
you first look at yourself and THEN dare to point your dirty finger towards us..
laaz nabhako..j pani bolechha!!


"Well...whatever you all say.........Nepal is too small for us to care about..."
"Your country Nepal has become a state of India now. Just waiting to see a change in the map. Your head of state and vice presidents speak Hindi. They are Indian. I think he should have taken oath in Bhojpuri as it is the language of great Bihar. Now even the PM will be Yadav and your country will be eventually the Land of India and the Kingdom of Yadavs.
Jai Bihar!" WAT IS THIS????
You are fcking insane man..u need serious psychiatric help..A SERIOUS ONE.
Do you even think before posting anything?..or do you know a bit of history?
But I can understand..people like you can never rise above this...you are meant for this..you look dirty from outside u r dirtier deep within..and you still ask us if we have any reason to hate you.. You will be hated for ages to come!!..
i wish i could drive out all of you from Nepal BY MYSELF!!

JAI NEPAL

LONG LIVE NEPAL...http://www.sajha.com/sajha/chat/smileys/npflag.gif
l

Mujhi Bihari,

Tero buddi kando ma cha pakh nepali le lat hane pachi balla tero buddi aauncha.

WHY ALL OF US TALKING AGAINST BIHARI...HE EVEN DONT KNOW ABOUT HIS COUNTRY AND THE HISTORY...ARE BIHARI BABU..DONT U KNOW DA FIGHT BETWEEN SRILANKA AND INDIA...U WANNA KNOW THE FIGHT OF THE INDIA WITH OTHER COUNTRIES..DO U KNOW THAT ALL THE INDIANS GOING IN OTHER COUNTRIES DONT DECLARE THEMSELVES AS INDIAN..DO U KNOW WHEN A TAMIL TIGER KILLED UR EX PRESIDENT...DO U KNOW WHEN A SRILANKAN SOLDIER BEAT UP RAJIV GANDI IN THE WHOLE STADIUM IN SRILANKA..DO U KNOW ABOUT THE DIRTY POLITICS OF UR COUNTRY....DO U KNOW HOW YOU GUYS ARE KNOWN IN THE INDIA...BIHAR IS KNOWN AS THE TRASH OF INDIA...AND AS A BIHARI U TOO.. A HOLES OF INDIA...PROUD TO BE INDIAN...WHT DA F@CK... EVEN DONT KNOW UR OWN POSITION IN DA WHOLE COUNTRY AND CRYING FOR DA COUNTRY...SEE WHT U ARE AND WHT U ARE DOING..WHOM U FIGHTING AGAINST...DIRTY PEOPLE OF THE DIRTY COUNTRY..GOD DAMNET...HAVE U EVEN GONE OUT OF BIHAR...HAVE U SEEN DELHI AND CALCUTTA...SHIT DIRTY PLACE I HAVE EVER SEEN..AND I DONT WANNA TALK ABOUT BIHAR....IF DELHI IS BAD THAN CALCUTTA IS WORST..GO AND ASK WITH OTHER INDIAN ABOUT BIHARI..AND GIVE ME A FAVOR..DONT TELL THEM U ARE BIHARI..COZ U WILL SHAME ON URSELF....TRASH OF THE SOCIETY...U BIHARI...

Bekar ma Bihari babu sanga k jhagda garnu. Bihari babu, I don't even support a ethinic Langauge in the president and vice president oath ceremony. Language should be such that everybody understands. Many people in nepal does not even understand Hindi. So Only thing that was acceptable was to take oath in Nepali which majority of Nepalese understand.

Mathi ko article ta ramrai sanga analyze gariyeko raichha.  Ek patak ta socha badhya banaundo racihha.  Huna pnani sakchha hola.  Aakhir ma Gyandendra le ta kehi nagarikana afno bichara kurshi ko balidaan garyo.  Mora Prachanda, Girija haru ta na marunjel kurshi ke chhodchhan hola ra. Ekpatak pheri rajtantra tir jana man lagi sakyo.  Hami sabai jana Nepali road ma utrer pheri rajtantra lyanu aawashakta jasto malai dekhiyo.  Saathi haru ko ke opinion chha yes bare ma?

BihariBabu = rabblerouser. Be gone pest!

I'm sorry, but I have to comment again.

Mr. Bihari Babu, I called you a rabble rouser, but turns out you are not.

You sir, are, what people in your language call, a "choot ka dhakkan".

How condescendingly you presume that your country is bigger and hence overshadows us? Please dont take the liberty of speaking for all 1419 Million people in your country, as I'm pretty sure you aren't the elected representative sent out to be the voice of India. In other words, your opinion is NOT welcome here.

Yes it is true, that Indian businessmen have a strong grip on the Nepalese economy. It is also true that the Indian government is trying its level best to make us 'honey producing bees' like the nation of Bhutan. But let me tell you this my friend, it isn't going to be a walk in the park for your country to do that.

I mean just look at you trying to storm over our forum like its your piece of Bihar? No! Not gonna happen. Access Denied!

I also hope you do realize what you are sparking off could well be a full blown hate war. You are trying to win a game by showing off, but you're in the away team's court. Go back to your own turf and preach Mr. Bihari Babu.

I don't hate Indians. Just the ones that think like you do. There arent a lot of people that think like you do Mr. Bihari Babu, but the ones that do, are enough for us to hate on. Even educated, appreciative Indian folks detest the likes of you. I would love to categorize your kind into a group of your own so that we may distinguish between the 'good Indians' and 'bad Indians' but I'm still waiting for someone to coin the exact term.

Shame on you. Don't you have universities in Bihar?

Kina lageko hola bihari ko pachadi, problem ta hamrai ho ni khasma, hami le nai mauka deko ho yiniharu lai nepali ko barema kura katne.  bekkar ma ke ghagda garnu testa sanga. 
baru mathi ko article ko barema kehi prakash parun ki?

BihariBabu, Mind your language. We are Nepalese and proud to be Nepalese. I am presonally warning you. If you humiliate Nepal and Nepalese, be sure your life in danger. When  Chhimobu trigger gun, your yadav family will not save you, mind it!

Seek the change in you, let us build the new Nepal of our choice not by hatred but by watchfull inclusion.

The Biharibabu username is one of us playing the negative persuasion, but let us understand that this in 21st century will need more of human approach over such racial issues. Hence, learn to respect and get the respect you deserve and calling someone down will not make you up anyway. Hence, just use your wits and wisdom part over mere Gorkhe tato ragat and its amplifications.

I am happy for the nationalistic feeling but the time demands more than that.

I agree with kalekrishna, we need to play an active role rather than criticizing these dumbo leaders.