[VIEWED 4717
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
MimroRaMero
Please log in to subscribe to MimroRaMero's postings.
Posted on 07-22-15 1:27
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
So USCIS says "Continues living in US since 24th June", teso bhanna le July 24th dekhi US ma basi raheko, right? Why would they want someone living from 24th, instead of living before 24th. Shouldn't it be like this "Continues living in US On/Before 24th"? Anyway I am just curious :) Can someone have two status. So if someone in F1 apply for TPS, his/her F1 status terminated. I am little confuse about it. I know we can't have two EADs, but what about two status. Thanks for your input.
|
|
|
|
ny2
Please log in to subscribe to ny2's postings.
Posted on 07-22-15 7:15
AM [Snapshot: 45]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Nepal was granted a TPS on 24th. TPS is given with the fact that it is not a favorable condition to go to Nepal due to the earthquake disaster. It does not matter whether a person has been living in US decades before or one day before 24th june, if that person has gone to Nepal after 24th June, USCIS might reject TPS for him, the reason being he felt comfortable to travel to Nepal. That's why USCIS wanted the continuous presence from 24th June, the day it granted TPS for Nepal. As posted in so many earlier posts, you can have F1 and TPS side by side.
|
|
|
MimroRaMero
Please log in to subscribe to MimroRaMero's postings.
Posted on 07-22-15 9:16
AM [Snapshot: 94]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Thanks for your reply. So if some one travel to Nepal on Advance parole after TPS is granted, does it gonna affect on TPS renewal?
|
|
|
bikash_001
Please log in to subscribe to bikash_001's postings.
Posted on 07-22-15 12:40
PM [Snapshot: 194]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
mimroRaMero, I think if one goes for a short visit citing family emergency then should not be a problem, I think. However, if one goes for a vacation of 3 months, then USCIS might consider that this person is not really affected by earthquake in Nepal, so could return back from port of entry. However, if goes for a period of 15 days or a month for unavoidable circumstances then should not be a problem to return or reapply for extension. However, need to talk a lawyer for confirmation. This is just my understanding.
|
|
|