[Show all top banners]

Sekhar Khanal
Replies to this thread:

More by Sekhar Khanal
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 6 ÷ 2(2 + 1)=
[VIEWED 17340 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 08-06-17 4:36 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

1 or 9...which should be more correct
 
Posted on 08-06-17 5:24 PM     [Snapshot: 31]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 
 
Posted on 08-06-17 5:28 PM     [Snapshot: 38]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

damn pepsi, you don't have to go on offense mode man...chill
 
Posted on 08-06-17 7:10 PM     [Snapshot: 126]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Should be 9

6 ÷ 2 (2+1) = 6 ÷ 2 (3) = 6 ÷ 2 x 3 = 3 x 3 = 9

Brackets > Division > Multiplication
 
Posted on 08-06-17 7:22 PM     [Snapshot: 141]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 
 
Posted on 08-06-17 9:32 PM     [Snapshot: 248]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

BODMAS.

Also, division and multiplication are same (D is not > M) in priority, you just go from left to right.

BODMAS dictates that Of (sometimes also identified as order of) gets priority. So 6÷2(3) = 6÷6 since 2 of 3 gets priority first.

Answer is 1.
 
Posted on 08-07-17 6:23 AM     [Snapshot: 399]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     3       ?     Liked by
 

Lazyketa and CP21 and Sekhar Khamnal : are you folks IT professionals??????????
Last edited: 07-Aug-17 06:29 AM

 
Posted on 08-07-17 10:02 AM     [Snapshot: 546]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     1       ?     Liked by
 

Magorkhe1 writes:
Lazyketa and CP21 and Sekhar Khamnal : are you folks IT professionals??????????
Last edited: 07-Aug-17 06:29 AM
What are you implying? I sense condescension in your reply.

Seriously dude, this question doesn't have a clear cut answer. Answer can be 1 or 9, depending on how you assume extra set of innate parenthesis lies.
Kiddo bro had extra parenthesis after division (notice how he did not collapse parenthesis after addition was done).
6÷(2 (2+1)) =1
(6÷2) (2+1) =9
6÷2 (2+1) = ambiguity, I would lean towards 9. As 6÷ 2× 3= 3×3=9
 
Posted on 08-07-17 11:22 AM     [Snapshot: 626]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     2       ?     Liked by
 

The answer is 1


 
Posted on 08-07-17 12:06 PM     [Snapshot: 657]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

The answer is 1.
 
Posted on 08-07-17 6:49 PM     [Snapshot: 768]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

well the correct answer is 9 ( after 2012) ..after replacing bodmas system tks
 
Posted on 08-07-17 9:16 PM     [Snapshot: 867]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     2       ?     Liked by
 


You saw the response ? Still arguing for 9, I have met couple similar people and they were IT's. 
Yes it is satire ( corrected). 

Last edited: 08-Aug-17 07:27 PM

 
Posted on 08-07-17 9:23 PM     [Snapshot: 877]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

@magorkhe1
Setire? Could not understand, my dear know-all? You are genius, may be it has another meaning... I doubt it is spelling mistake from such a genius and Mr. Know-all like u...
Please clarify... plss plss
 
Posted on 08-08-17 8:23 AM     [Snapshot: 994]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

6 ÷ 2(2 + 1)=1
6 ÷ 2x(2 + 1)=9

End of discussion
 
Posted on 08-08-17 6:07 PM     [Snapshot: 1098]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Sekhar khanal: do you have a link suggesting death of bodmas? Some programming languages do not use bodmas, rather they parse from left to right, if that's what you are referring to.
For those who double down on 1, here is an idea, take your old TI calculator, I have TI84 from 2007 and the answer is 9.
If you have a casio, answer will be 1.
Like I said above, this is an ambiguous problem.

 
Posted on 08-23-17 8:34 PM     [Snapshot: 1450]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     2       ?     Liked by
 

हो त्यो सेटायर नै हो | खंदुकी को कुनै कमि छैन साझामा भनि कसैले कमेन्ट गर्नु हुन्थ्यो | inbox यस्ता कुरा पठाउन पछि परेनन् |

tito-satya 15 days ago
khaate
tito-satya 15 days ago
ta [Disallowed String for - use not allowed] khaate ko hos malai thaha chha... raadi ko chhoro, talai aba ma 6od.dina...

Last edited: 24-Aug-17 03:59 AM

 
Posted on 12-07-19 11:07 PM     [Snapshot: 6865]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 
 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 7 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Re-registration case still pending ..
and it begins - on Day 1 Trump will begin operations to deport millions of undocumented immigrants
Travel Document for TPS (approved)
All the Qatar ailines from Nepal canceled to USA
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters