Is this possible?

1. Newton's theory suggested the existence of gravitational force, but we claim there is no such gravitational force. There is the existence of electromagnetic force as suggested by our final form of derived equation:
F=m (B+1/E)
F=m B + m E'
where, E'=1/E
F=F1 + F2 equ(1)
Here, B= acceleration due to magnetic force
E'=acceleration due to electric force
Also,
F1=m B, is the force try to pull any other object towards its center
F2=m E', is the force try to create rotational effect on any other object

2. Einstein suggested the increase in mass with increase in velocity, but he failed to explained change in mass with change in distance (or height) with respect to reference body (or object).
Our final form of equation shows there is decrease in mass if there is decrease in height (or distance) and ultimately reduced to rest mass, Also, there is increase in mass if there is increase in height (or distance).
Therefore, equ(1) can be written as:
F= mB / [v(1-(h2/(R+h)2))] + m E' . [v(1-(h2/(R+h)2))]

B=G m / [(R+h)2 . v(1-(h2/(R+h)2))]
E'=1/E= G m . [v(1-(h2/(R+h)2))] /(R+h)2
Our these equation exactly calculate the time period of moon around earth, time period of earth around sun and time period of satellite around earth.

Conclusion:
1. There is no gravitational force
2. There is only one mother force, which is electromagnetic force. It shows different nature in different state and form.
3. Mass not only depends upon velocity but also depends upon height (or distance)

Application:
1. It is possible to walk on artificial satellite as in earth.
2. Any object can easily fly on earth surface without creating noise or air pollution. (i.e. There is no requirement of fuel energy

In your first equation F=ma, you cannot substitute B +1/E for acceleration a. This is because  acceleration must be in the same direction as force. In the case of gravity, it is towards the center of the Earth.
But you are saying that Gravity does not exist. That means
Assumption: There is no force towards the center of the Earth.

And you are saying the acceleration is due to the Electric or magnetic field. Now think about where the Magnetic field is directed towards. In the case of Earth, the Magnetic field is way stronger than electric, so I will give my analysis in terms of Magnetic field. So, we know the magnetic field points towards the Magnetic north (which is the geographic south pole btw). That means we should be accelerating towards the south pole if Magnetic field is the only force we are experiencing. (remember we said gravity is out of the picture). But we know that there is a force that pulls us towards the center and thus it cannot be the Magnetic force.......
Hence by contradiction, there is a gravitational attraction after all.

Peace.

By introducing two variables B and E' does not prove anything. This is not a proof but a hoax if  you fail to give concrete proof. If you really can proof there is no gravity I would expect more than two equations with two arbitary variables.

Some more logical answers please.

Sabaiko Satru,
Lets put away the formula for now, and lets just talk in plain English, shall we?Formulation through formula  will come later. ( not by me though)
putting formula asides, I see several fallacies in your hypothesis or what you call conclusion:

1) Newtonian physics is not a complete physics. It's a classical physics and does not even explain electromagnetic force after max Planck's constant. All off the Quantum physics world  and its variation fields does not follow Newtonian physics.

2) The theory of everything is trying to find all the forces of the universe and how they tie-in with each other. They have tied-in all the forces except gravitational force. If you solve it, you have theory of everything. These forces will tell you all you need to know about the formation of universe. Hence, don't draw your conclusion just from Newtonian formulations

3) there you go!! Physics is not a complete science yet. All the dots have not connected yet.
So hold your horses satru, dont attempt walking on artificial satellite just yet.
You cannot come to  such grand conclusion just by looking at few formulas. Formulas are for suckers.
Most of discoveries in Physics have been done through thought experiments.
So think away.
good luck!




 

Assuming that every brilliant idea may look crazy in the beginning and assuming that you have not lost your mind...

I have some quest:

Your idea seem to emerge from the observation that 'spin can defy gravity'
If this was the notion to derive the formula, get me your units. Either you have to derive the formulation with assumption that there are only and only two mass chunks in the universe.
Height?
What is height?

Since you said "no-force": you can not talk about any kind of force, as there should be no kind of force in the picture!
So, you are messing up with your "discovery" with the pertaining fuzzy ideas.
NEVER MIX ' EM UP!

Your last application seems intersting.
Keep posting, feels good!

Conclusion:
1. There is no gravitational force.

 WTF! there is gravitational force!

probably you are takin 'bout gravitational wave like EM wave. Symmetry suggests there has to be graviton like photon but existence of graviton has to be proved !

Mass is invariant . But be clear which mass you talkin bout, rest mass or relativistic mass! 

 

 

 

Remember all the science is either Physics or Stamp collecting!

i just wanna keep this alive