As a matter of fact, I also think Mr. Yadav’s excessive “maverickism” and less patience/understanding for the arduous process required for the sustainable reform has discredited otherwise possibly a good (and naïve) intention.
The other day we were having a discussion on our expectation of Maoist. A reference was made for “Robinhood” to Mr. Yadav.
I am sharing it here.
Nepe
*** *** *** *** *** *** ***
From: D
To: nepaldemocracy@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: The Dabur saga
P..-jee,
I think you caught the drift. All our rulers so far (kings, Panchas,
NC and UML) had “bikas/industilization” of Nepal as a wish when they
were not in power and a “magi khane bhaando” while in power.
A serious vision, homework, plan and determined execution were never
there. Otherwise, as you put very well, the foundation (the
infrastructure) should have gotten the most importance and our country
should have placed its paced accordingly.
What about Maoist ?
I think Maoist has potential for every possibilities. It can be worse,
it can be as bad as and it can be better than our previous rulers.
On the positive sight, it has a CHANCE. On the negative side, it has
it’s dogmatic legacy. Barring (perhaps) from few, most of it’s leaders
are trained and so believe in what can be called “Robinhood” economy
(Minister Matrika Yadav’s recent robinhood drama, a case in point).
Interestingly, Prachanda has claimed a couple of times that he has a
group of highly qualified experts currently busy doing homework/
research to come up with a grand economic plan for Nepal.
I am watching with great anticipation and crossing my fingers.
D
>From: P
>Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:53:18 -0400
>To: nepaldemocracy@googlegroups.com
>Subject: Re: [ND] Re: The Dabur saga
>
>
> Dear Friends:
> You need strong foundation to build a strong house! All past efforts for
> rapid industrialization failed because of wanting the roof before the
> foundation. The foundation of progress is in education, organization and
> discipline. If Maoists can deliver these three things, I would be happy
> without them giving us any high-flying industries. The industry will
> naturally follow when the fundamentals are right. However, many of our
> friends with strong attachment with the past seem to cry foul today that the
> Maoists are in power (as if the past rulers delivered us the desired
> results).
>
> Sincerely,
> P
>>From: B
>>Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
>>To: nepaldemocracy@googlegroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [ND] The Dabur saga
>>
>> if i own a multi-national company why would i want to work in nepal? there
>> is no security and the union militancy is just off the charts. government is
>> in bed with the trouble makers..nepal is not the right place to do
>> business..it is that simple.
>>
>> B
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: A
>>> To: Nepal Democracy Google Group <nepaldemocracy@googlegroups.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 9:57:03 PM
>>> Subject: [ND] The Dabur saga
>>>
>>> FYI.
>>>
>>> A. The Maoist Trade Union launched the strike (see the news item below).
>>> These days, in Nepal, most companies have four different (politically
>>> affiliated) unions, each of which try to out-do the others in terms of
>>> militancy.
>>>
>>> B. PM Dahal reportedly asked his younger comrades to stop the strike at
>>> Dabur so that his visit to India would go smoothly without his having to
>>> answer awkward questions about Dabur Nepal.
>>>
>>>
>>> C. Upon party-nirdeshan, the Trade Union stopped its strike at Dabur
>>> Nepal.
>>>
>>> D. Dabur Nepal'sx management then said, "Look, we can't just open the
>>> factory now as if nothing happened." It then put forward it own legally
>>> valid demands.
>>>
>>> E. Other Nepal-based multinationals and foreign and domestic investors are
>>> keenly watching how the Dabur saga plays out.
>>>
>>> F. However it plays out, since markets react to both weak and strong
>>> signals, the overall task of attracting capital to Nepal for investments and
>>> business has gotten HARDER no matter how Dahal & Company spin the Dabur
>>> story.
>>>
>>> G. From what I know, all things being equal, multinationals (in Nepal, and
>>> like in most places in developing countries) typically pay the highest wages
>>> (across all levels), offer the best possible working environment (compared
>>> to domestic counterparts) attract the best of Nepali managers.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-3482658,prtpage-1.cms
>>>
>>> Workers end strike, but Dabur Nepal wants pact
>>> 14 Sep, 2008, 1922 hrs IST, IANS
>>>
>>> KATHMANDU: The discord at the Nepal factory of Indian multinational Dabur
>>> has reached a new stage with its striking workers saying they are ready to
>>> return to work but the management refusing to resume production until the
>>> striking union signs an agreement.
*** *** *** *** *** *** ***