[Show all top banners]

symlyn
Replies to this thread:

More by symlyn
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 FYI: Government Decision on Petroleum Prices Deserves Public Support
[VIEWED 3600 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 01-13-05 7:25 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Soon after government hiked the petroleum pice, Clean Energy Nepal (CEN), cen@mos.com.np came up with following press release.

I think basic economics is missing in this press release. Past records shows slightest price hike in petroleum products influences every market sector - literaterally everything that comes with price. I do confess that earlier when the petroleum price was low, it was most of the 'taskars' in the border area who made quite a money smuggling it to India, so either price had to hiked or taskars' way had to be closed. And the government found earlier solution easy.

Lets talk about real subsidy here, not the fake ones that government promises. Time will tell whether farmers and the people in remote district would get subsidy or they get subsided.

symlyn

========================================
Press Release
12 January 2005
Government Decision on Petroleum Prices Deserves Public Support

On 10 January, 2005 the government finally had the guts to raise petroleum prices, which was long overdue considering the rise in international oil prices, huge losses of Rs. 300 million per month being borne by the Nepal Oil Corporation (NOC) and its accumulated debt of about Rs. 5 billion. Clean Energy Nepal supports the government?s decisions to raise petroleum prices; provide transportation subsidy to 22 remote districts so that poor people there can have access to kerosene at the same price as consumers in Kathmandu; allow NOC?s Board to adjust petroleum prices according to fluctuations in the international market, and reduce NOC?s overhead costs by Rs. 200 million. However, NOC should become more transparent and take concrete steps to reduce overhead cost and supply high quality fuel.

We urge people to think about the following facts while forming an opinion on the decision:

1. Only 9 percent of the energy consumed in Nepal is supplied by petroleum products, and 77 percent of Nepalese households use biomass, fuel such as fuelwood and dung, for cooking. This means that the majority of the poor people in Nepal are not really benefiting from low petroleum prices. It will be wiser for the government to support the promotion of energy technologies, such as improved cooking stoves, biogas and ?Tukimara? lamps, which directly benefit the poor.

2. Because of the huge differences in petroleum prices in India and Nepal, a significant amount of petroleum was being smuggled to Nepal and the government was thus subsidizing the smugglers and Indian consumers. Although with the new prices, the prices are still lower in Nepal (the price of petrol is lower by Rs. 1.98, diesel by Rs. 4.05 and kerosene by Rs. 2 per litre), the gap is now less. Therefore the incentive for smuggling has been reduced.

3. Although the government has been providing kerosene at a subdized rate, poor people in remote districts, haven?t really been able to enjoy this subsidy because of high transportation cost. For example a litre in kerosene in Humla used to cost about Rs. 150, compared to Rs. 24 or Rs. 28 in Kathmandu. This was an unfair system as people and industries who did not deserve the subsidies were enjoying it while the people who need it most were being left out. Now, hopefully, the subsidy will be a bit more evenly distributed.

4. Allowing the NOC Board to set oil prices is a step forward in keeping politics out of petroleum.

5. Nepal does not produce petroleum and it is a dirty fuel. In fact, diesel exhaust is a known carcinogen. Yet we continue to spend our precious foreign reserves in importing increasing amounts of dirty fuel while our own energy resources, which are also clean and renewable, remain underutilized. The increase in petroleum prices will level the playing field to a certain extent and increase demand for clean domestic fuel. For example, people in Bhattedanda, Lalitpur have decided to use electricity to power their ropeway instead of diesel. Similarly, this will also help increase the demand for electric vehicles in Kathmandu, which will result in cleaner air and better health for us all. In fact, because of the high environmental and social cost of fossil fuel vehicles, there should be an additional environmental tax on fossil fuel in Kathmandu.

CEN also urges all protestors to refrain from burning tires, which is very hazardous to health, while expressing their opinions.

Bhushan Tuladhar, Executive Director
=============================

 
Posted on 01-14-05 6:04 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Although they all sound plausible, we should take it with a pinch of salt. However, what cannot be digested is the statement of the incompetent competent Prime Minister justifying the hike in fuel price to support the security budget.

Damn it, why don't you chop off the cost of the royalties and top heavy royal Nepal army? What is the justification of 80% royal budget last year when the same percentages of royalties are gone after the Narayanhity massacre? There is an outright anger growing among the public due to all of it; one does not have to be a political scientist to feel the pulse of the nation.

I appreciate CEN thinking about the common public and for the people as far as in Humla. Why this empathy now ---one wonders. We all know that in Nepal, the politicians, administrators and royalties give a damn to common public. When it comes to the real thing, "Bhand me jae sadharan janata, mero jholi bhare bhaigo" is the real attitude.

With the downward spiral of the economy and dwindling situations in the villages, there is going hardly anything to cook. There will be no need for any kind of fuel or worries for pollution. Will the clean air people be happy with the government?

The most pollutants in the cities are created by the donor agencies' vehicles who take the duty free gas from their own pumps. Can the donor agencies or donor driven project vehicles be asked to maintain austerity in using the scarce fuel? May be not.

These are my futya kowri worth.

 
Posted on 01-15-05 9:59 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

I fully agree with CEN that tire burning should be stopped in the interest of health of people. There are other forms of protests that are less hazardous. In fact, burning anything out on the street should be prohibited, including wahiyat dhuni during the SHivaratri.

Those who can see and feel the pains of the country burning, speak up!!!
 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 7 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Re-registration case still pending ..
and it begins - on Day 1 Trump will begin operations to deport millions of undocumented immigrants
I hope all the fake Nepali refugee get deported
Travel Document for TPS (approved)
All the Qatar ailines from Nepal canceled to USA
MAGA मार्का कुरा पढेर दिमाग नखपाउनुस !
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters