[VIEWED 2518
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
kishnekale
Please log in to subscribe to kishnekale's postings.
Posted on 11-25-07 9:20
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
After four years of retirement, Sampras stunned the unstoppable Federer. Very few would believe that a rusty Pete could gun down the invincible....Roger FeDex. One of fittest in his heyday, Sampras is still good enough to come over someone like Roger Federer.......not a joke. What does it mean? Sampras retired too early??
|
|
|
|
sahayog
Please log in to subscribe to sahayog's postings.
Posted on 11-25-07 12:56
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Yeah, even I saw Sampras beat Robby Ginepri here in Frisco. But again, Federer loses so many exhibition matches and I do not think he takes other tournaments other than the Grand Slams too seriously. Sampras would still be competitive if he were to come back from retirement but I do not see him come close to another Grand Slam. (unless Agassi makes a comeback and they have a Grand Slam Final Matchup LOL )
|
|
|
no_quiero
Please log in to subscribe to no_quiero's postings.
Posted on 11-25-07 1:41
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Federer is better than sampras. By the time Federer ends up his career he will end up being the best player ever. Like Sampras French open is eluding Federer but unlike sampras Federer has been quite close to winning it and it is only matter of time. FEDex is the best.
|
|
|
sleepyspur
Please log in to subscribe to sleepyspur's postings.
Posted on 12-04-07 10:59
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|