|
[VIEWED 3854
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
bikash kc
Please log in to subscribe to bikash kc's postings.
Posted on 07-15-08 1:45
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
utousucks
Please log in to subscribe to utousucks's postings.
Posted on 07-15-08 9:13
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Bro, how's it going? I was watching the interview of the editor of New Yorker yesterday. His point was the cover was meant to be a satire. If that's the case I don't think I know what satire means. To me the cover page was a disgrace. I know Barack has been sending mixed signals regarding his foreign policy and sooner or later someone was going to make a fuss about it. But to drag Michelle Obama in such a derogatory pose was totally absurd. Well this is what freedom and speech and expression probably mean.
|
| |
|
|
bikash kc
Please log in to subscribe to bikash kc's postings.
Posted on 07-16-08 2:53
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
i second u MR. R
no doubt there are a lots of flip-flopping on many key issues from both Mc-cain and Obama
|
| |
|
|
Poon-Hill
Please log in to subscribe to Poon-Hill's postings.
Posted on 07-16-08 3:31
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
| Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
So now the NEW YORKER is bought by FOX as well??
|
| |
