A lady reporter from Aaj Tak approaches a Nepali girl wearing helmet to protect herself from earthquake and ask, "Why are you wearing this helmet?"

What kind of dumb question is this? Please boycott all Indian Media now and also in near future. If you see any Indian media reporting from any Nepali town, immediately snatch their mic and camera and harass them so that they won't dare to come back to Nepal for any kind of reporting. Thank you and Jai Nepal.

lol.... Chanakya niti is not about yes or no in all situation. The current circumstances of Nepal is asking that we kick Indian Media out of Nepal right now. However, when time comes we must worship them as if they are our gods. This all depends on circumstances. And this is Chanakya niti.

That is not the answer.

Whenever you put yr words in spiritualism specially Vedic concept I will raise this question again and again.

Right now I am watching CNN international "witness of devastation" they also have interviews, BBC had too, but no one is asking such questions. CNN and BBC also have seen such things during their reporting. But they report politely, one question was how much hope did u had to find your kids,? Etc etc.

But Indian reporter behaved "lato desh ma gado Tanner I"

I am watching i24 news( Israeli international news), CCTV, chines international English news) sky news, BBC, CNN, alzazera and Indian TVs, only Indians doing such humiliating interview

Bichitra Kumar!
How a third person (lets say other nationality, Japanese one) will feel between a reporter who asks insensitive question 6 times or asks why some body is wearing helmet in earthquake and a person who says "If you see any Indian media reporting from any Nepali town, immediately snatch their mic and camera and harass them so that they won't dare to come back to Nepal for any kind of reporting."

@paradox....When I talk about spiritualism I am in different dimension of reality. You cannot punish a thief which you saw in your dream last night in waking reality. You always have to take standpoints and I am taking relative standpoint right now and applying Kutniti to protect Nepal. However, when I talk about pure Spiritualism, I take Absolute standpoint and this waking world doesn't exist for me at that time. In other words, Nepal doesn't doesn't exist when I talk about pure Spiritualism. So, I live in different dimensions accordingly and different laws operate in different dimensions. Brahma loka and Mrityu loka operates differently and we have to behave accordingly.

UJL,
You are still defending.
You said "you take absolute standpoint and relative stand point for different situation".
which means, you are intellectual in spiritual talk and what you say does not apply in your own life. That is you are not honest to yourself let alone to others.

@paradox.....You have not understood what I said. Different laws operate in different dimension. Nepal is real in waking reality, so applying kutniti to protect it from foreign hands is okay in Rajniti Shastra. Prithvi Narayan Shah killed so many people to annex Nepal. Even killing people is not condemned depending on different situation. Different laws applies.
लातो के भूत बातो से नही मानते ----- And these lato ke bhoot are Indian Media and Nepal has to apply different tactics to handle these hooligans.

I feel some how you feel what you said was wrong ( I am guessing it from your past postings and also yr so much effort to defend) but you have some kind of complexity you cannot accept here what you said is wrong.
This happens a lot in intellectual gymnastics where assumed intellectual personality is in threat. It seems you are really very afraid to be simple and you try to cover up it with some jargon of words which only reveals you are defending.

@paradox....Now you are coming to "Ad Hominem." I hope you understand this term.

That is still yr defend.

So i can say "in relative stand point of indian journalist, she did the right thing", in relative stand point what you said is right for you. In relative stand point no matter what one does is right in some one's relative stand point. If India attacks nepal, it will be right (most likely billion relative stand point will support it), if china attacks it will be right (again billion relative stand point will support it"

So you can choose between relative stand point and absolute stand point ( I am not sure of absolute stand point exist. I feel "Absolute" deny "stand point" and vice versa".

As you can chose between relative and absolute stand point, seems you are beyond both.

Hopefully some day you will declare you almighty, allknowing and all pervading and so on.

I am seeing some warranted and some unwarranted hatred towards India and Indian media.

The purpose of the question was to initiate a conversation towards the state of things in Nepal, not to know why she actually is wearing the helmet. It's like asking bhat khanu bho?

@kiddo.....I was watching Aaj Tak and they showed a picture of Pashupatinath and claimed it is the picture from Basantapur Durbar Square and now it has become rubble. On next day, another lady reporter comes to Pashupatinath temple and starts talking about how great Lord Shiva is that nothing happened to this temple and they started talking how great Hinduism is and all that. Then and There I stopped watching any Indian Media.

chase Indians and their supporters out of our country

haha nas here is more, fake sensitization

more ridiculous claim 

some dhotis may call me as communist no surprise kinda paradoxical itself but so many nepalis can't be wrong.

Ujl, this thread does not sound Vedic. This thread sounds like regular stuff you get on facebook.

@power_ranger...... It's better to enjoy Sunny Leone's Bollywood song rather than talk Vedic in Sajha! You also enjoy the song. I heard Sunny will be playing the role of 'Sita'. Can't wait. Nas, can you confirm about Sunny playing Sita's role? Please enjoy this song for now. She is a baby doll.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86hS5Hsyfus

Ujl, it's good to know you also enjoy Sunny Leone's boobs and that you're not a Vedic extremist fundamentalist.