[VIEWED 8026
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
gauleketo
Please log in to subscribe to gauleketo's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 1:27
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Guys if you are buying TV then stop stop stop !! Get Ready for 3D HDTV which will be out by mid of 2010. WOW! We can feel The 3D at our OWN HOUSE .साथी हो संसार कहाँ बाट कहाँ पुग्दै छ , कस्तो अचम्म लाग्छ यार
ESPN plans a 3D channel, Panasonic/DirecTV and Sony/Discovery/IMAX also
announced programming plans, and a Blu-ray Disc standard was announced
last month
Last edited: 10-Jan-10 01:34 PM
|
|
|
|
Quagmire
Please log in to subscribe to Quagmire's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 1:47
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
While I understand what you're saying, you're completely ignoring the price factor of such tvs. They won't be cheap, thats for sure!
|
|
|
Lahure Kancha
Please log in to subscribe to Lahure Kancha's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 1:58
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
no_quiero
Please log in to subscribe to no_quiero's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 4:55
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
3D tv will take at least 5 years to be popular and household name. HD tv will go pretty strong by then. To broadcast in 3 D the videos should be taken by multiple cameras. I doubt there are enough content at the moment in the world to be broadcasted in 3D. People still capture video on 2D. May be they can broadcast for few hours. Secondly it is bound to be very very expensive because those programs needs to get its production cost. Thirdly, I see the 3D tv products. Whichever 3D tv product i saw be it Huyndai or Sony. Those 3D tv needs special glasses to be seen in 3D. I wonder how many people would want to keep wearing glasses to watch the 3D TV.
|
|
|
Sleepless
Please log in to subscribe to Sleepless's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 5:28
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Just like any other *on-demand* technology, content delivery mechanism is equally as important as content providers/owners.
Luckily, the Cable system that provides TV signals with Video On Demand or Switched Digital Video is capable of providing 3DTV signals to your home. So the wait time for the technology to come to your home, provided you demand for it, is LESS than you expected!
And as always since it is a technology driven by demand than necessity and due to the popularity of HD technology and the whole avatar buzz, the content providers, cable equipment manufacturers, 3D tech companies and consumer electronics companies would work together with the standard bodies devising standard technologies for distribution of 3D TV over any medium to your home.
The Set Tops that you use at your home are already 3D frame compatibles and the cable bodies are working close for interoperability and specifications to make your "wearing 3D glasses at home" dream a reality pretty soon.
|
|
|
donald_duck
Please log in to subscribe to donald_duck's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 9:06
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I am an undergraduate student working illegally in gas stations. I have to work day and night for my tuition fee, food and room rent. Hence, I can not afford it. I pass it.
|
|
|
Pret Aatma
Please log in to subscribe to Pret Aatma's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 9:13
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Forget high cost and production complexity; 3D is best viewed in HUGE screens and from a certain distance else the picture blurs. Who would want to engineer all that at home? And 3D goggles are eye-straining gadgets for many. At home, most would want to take TV viewing easily - especially after a strenuous day at work. I would rather take my glasses off and view Anderson Cooper on a 2D lying down on my couch.
It will be like riding a roller-coaster to work - very exciting to do once in a while but not something you would want to do everyday. In summary, epic fail. No harm in experimenting though. Good luck, Panasonic!
|
|
|
Sleepless
Please log in to subscribe to Sleepless's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 9:50
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Much of the innovations like these come from exclusive demand from people. If it is cool to have a mini-phone-PC on your palm and revolve your world around it, it is cool to be busy with a 3D experience at home from a harsh day at work too. Anyway, I am not even debating if it is necessary or not or to what age groups and what not.
Here is the research that surveys a bit onto the 3D Market.
http://www.quixelresearch.com/pdfs/Quixel_3D_Study_2009_Overview_ZZZ.pdf
|
|
|
Ved555
Please log in to subscribe to Ved555's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 11:00
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
If you can wear condom, then why would it be a problem/hassle to wear tha tspecial 3D glasses?????
|
|
|
justforthistime
Please log in to subscribe to justforthistime's postings.
Posted on 01-10-10 11:55
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Those glasses give me headache. So no for me.
|
|
|
CyberLegend
Please log in to subscribe to CyberLegend's postings.
Posted on 01-11-10 11:10
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I am Greating Ready for 3DHD LOL
|
|
|
Power_Ranger
Please log in to subscribe to Power_Ranger's postings.
Posted on 01-11-10 1:06
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Don't buy 3D TV yet unless you are very rich. It will be very expensive initially.
|
|
|
Hussain_Khan
Please log in to subscribe to Hussain_Khan's postings.
Posted on 01-11-10 1:11
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I agree with donald_duck.
|
|